Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials

被引:219
作者
Woertman, Willem [1 ]
de Hoop, Esther [1 ]
Moerbeek, Mirjam [2 ]
Zuidema, Sytse U. [3 ]
Gerritsen, Debby L. [4 ]
Teerenstra, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Evidence, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Methodol & Stat, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community Care, Ctr Family Med Geriatr Care & Publ Hlth, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Cluster randomized trial; Stepped wedge design; Parallel group design; ANCOVA; Sample size; Design effect; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The stepped wedge design is increasingly being used in cluster randomized trials (CRTs). However, there is not much information available about the design and analysis strategies for these kinds of trials. Approaches to sample size and power calculations have been provided, but a simple sample size formula is lacking. Therefore, our aim is to provide a sample size formula for cluster randomized stepped wedge designs. Study Design and Setting: We derived a design effect (sample size correction factor) that can be used to estimate the required sample size for stepped wedge designs. Furthermore, we compared the required sample size for the stepped wedge design with a parallel group and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) design. Results: Our formula corrects for clustering as well as for the design. Apart from the cluster size and intracluster correlation, the design effect depends on choices of the number of steps, the number of baseline measurements, and the number of measurements between steps. The stepped wedge design requires a substantial smaller sample size than a parallel group and ANCOVA design. Conclusion: For CRTs, the stepped wedge design is far more efficient than the parallel group and ANCOVA design in terms of sample size. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 758
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, STAT MED, V18, P1905
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, CANCER RES, V47, P5782
[3]   Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: Two bibliometric surveys [J].
Bland J.M. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4 (1)
[4]  
Brown CA., 2006, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V6, P54, DOI DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-6-54
[5]   Cluster randomized trials in general (family) practice research [J].
Campbell, MJ .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (02) :81-94
[6]  
Donner A., 2010, Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research
[7]   ISSUES OF DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SURVEYS ACROSS TIME [J].
DUNCAN, GJ ;
KALTON, G .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 1987, 55 (01) :97-117
[8]   COHORT VERSUS CROSS-SECTIONAL DESIGN IN LARGE FIELD TRIALS - PRECISION, SAMPLE-SIZE, AND A UNIFYING MODEL [J].
FELDMAN, HA ;
MCKINLAY, SM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (01) :61-78
[9]   Selected statistical issues in group randomized trials [J].
Feng, ZD ;
Diehr, P ;
Peterson, A ;
McLerran, D .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 22 :167-187
[10]   Recruitment strategies in a cluster randomized trial - cost implications [J].
Flynn, TN ;
Whitley, E ;
Peters, TJ .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (03) :397-405