Assortative mating preferences between colour morphs of the endemic Lake Tanganyika cichlid genus Tropheus

被引:33
作者
Egger, Bernd [1 ]
Obermueller, Beate [1 ]
Eigner, Eva [1 ]
Sturmbauer, Christian [1 ]
Sefc, Kristina M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Dept Zool, A-8010 Graz, Austria
关键词
Mate preference; Assortative mating; Cichlids; Sexual selection; Tropheus; Colour divergence;
D O I
10.1007/s10750-008-9564-0
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Female mate preferences effectuate reproductive isolation among and sexual selection within species. Both mechanisms have been associated with the diversification and speciation of cichlid species flocks of the East African Great Lakes. In Lake Tanganyika, the endemic genus Tropheus has diversified into > 100 geographic colour morphs. Although distributed allopatrically at present, water level fluctuations have repeatedly displaced and merged the benthic, rock-dwelling populations. Tests for assortative mating were performed to explore the potential for reproductive isolation between morphs in secondary contact, and to assess the importance of sexual selection for the diversification of this group. In contrast to other haplochromine cichlids, Tropheus is a sexually monochromatic, territorial and maternally mouthbrooding fish, which establishes temporary pair bonds prior to spawning. Female mate preference trials involved two-way choices between a homotypic and a heterotypic male and were conducted on allopatric populations of red and blue morphs from the southern part of Lake Tanganyika. Female affiliation time near each male's compartment did not predict the mate preferences subsequently expressed in unrestrained interactions after removal of the compartment separators (spawning, pseudospawning and courtship). Consequently, mate preferences were inferred from unrestrained interactions with one test male at a time in replicate observation sessions. Of the 23 females tested, 13 courted, pseudospawned or spawned with the homotypic male, one blue female courted a red male, and nine females expressed no sexual motivation. The assortative mate preferences in the experiments (P < 0.01) suggest that colour differentiation between Tropheus populations can effectuate reproductive isolation, and is consistent with the notion that sexual selection contributed to the diversification of the genus.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish [J].
Amundsen, T ;
Forsgren, E .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (23) :13155-13160
[2]  
Andersson Malte, 1994
[3]   Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely [J].
Arnegard, ME ;
Kondrashov, AS .
EVOLUTION, 2004, 58 (02) :222-237
[4]   Repeatable female preferences, mating order and mating success in the poeciliid fish, Heterandria formosa [J].
Aspbury, AS ;
Basolo, AL .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2002, 51 (03) :238-244
[5]   Phylogeography and evolution of the Tanganyikan cichlid genus Tropheus based upon mitochondrial DNA sequences [J].
Baric, S ;
Salzburger, W ;
Sturmbauer, C .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 2003, 56 (01) :54-68
[6]   Male-male competition and the sword in male swordtails, Xiphophorus helleri [J].
Benson, KE ;
Basolo, AL .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2006, 71 :129-134
[7]   Sexual signaling in the European bitterling: females learn the truth by direct inspection of the resource [J].
Candolin, U ;
Reynolds, JD .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 12 (04) :407-411
[8]   JMATING: a software for the analysis of sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequency data [J].
Carvajal-Rodriguez, Antonio ;
Rolan-Alvarez, Emilio .
BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2006, 6 (1)
[9]   Female affiliative preference depends on reproductive state in the African cichlid fish, Astatotilapia burtoni [J].
Clement, TS ;
Grens, KE ;
Fernald, RD .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2005, 16 (01) :83-88
[10]   Color patterns and species recognition in four closely related species of Lake Malawi cichlid [J].
Couldridge, VCK ;
Alexander, GJ .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 13 (01) :59-64