Impact of Aortic Valve Stenosis on Coronary Hemodynamics and the Instantaneous Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

被引:80
作者
Wiegerinck, Esther M. A. [1 ]
van de Hoef, Tim P. [1 ]
Rolandi, M. Cristina [1 ]
Yong, ZeYie [1 ]
van Kesteren, Floortje [1 ]
Koch, Karel T. [1 ]
Vis, Marije M. [1 ]
de Mol, Bas A. J. M. [1 ]
Piek, Jan J. [1 ]
Baan, Jan, Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, AMC Heartctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
aortic valve stenosis; coronary circulation; coronary microvascular function; coronary microvascular resistance; coronary physiology; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; FREE RATIO PULLBACK; ARTERY-DISEASE; MICROVASCULAR RESISTANCE; COLLATERAL FLOW; REPLACEMENT; PRESSURE; INTERVENTION; OUTCOMES; REVASCULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002443
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Aortic valve stenosis (AS) induces compensatory alterations in left ventricular hemodynamics, leading to physiological and pathological alterations in coronary hemodynamics. Relief of AS by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) decreases ventricular afterload and is expected to improve microvascular function immediately. We evaluated the effect of AS on coronary hemodynamics and the immediate effect of TAVI. Methods and Results Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity were simultaneously assessed at rest and at maximal hyperemia in an unobstructed coronary artery in 27 patients with AS before and immediately after TAVI and in 28 patients without AS. Baseline flow velocity was higher and baseline microvascular resistance was lower in patients with AS as compared with controls, which remained unaltered post-TAVI. In patients with AS, hyperemic flow velocity was significantly lower as compared with controls (44.514.5 versus 54.3 +/- 18.6 cm/s; P=0.04). Hyperemic microvascular resistance (expressed in mm Hgcms(-1)) was 2.10 +/- 0.69 in patients with AS as compared with 1.80 +/- 0.60 in controls (P=0.096). Coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with AS was lower, 1.9 +/- 0.5 versus 2.7 +/- 0.7 in controls (P<0.001). Improvement in coronary hemodynamics after TAVI was most pronounced in patients without post-TAVI aortic regurgitation. In these patients (n=20), hyperemic flow velocity increased significantly from 46.24 +/- 15.47 pre-TAVI to 56.56 +/- 17.44 cm/s post-TAVI (P=0.003). Hyperemic microvascular resistance decreased from 2.03 +/- 0.71 to 1.66 +/- 0.45 (P=0.050). Coronary flow velocity reserve increased significantly from 1.9 +/- 0.4 to 2.2 +/- 0.6 (P=0.009). Conclusions The vasodilatory reserve capacity of the coronary circulation is reduced in AS. TAVI induces an immediate decrease in hyperemic microvascular resistance and a concomitant increase in hyperemic flow velocity, resulting in immediate improvement in coronary vasodilatory reserve.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   INTRAMURAL (SMALL VESSEL) CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE IN HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY [J].
MARON, BJ ;
WOLFSON, JK ;
EPSTEIN, SE ;
ROBERTS, WC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1986, 8 (03) :545-557
[22]   Pre-Angioplasty Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Pullback Provides Virtual Intervention and Predicts Hemodynamic Outcome for Serial Lesions and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease [J].
Nijjer, Sukhjinder S. ;
Sen, Sayan ;
Petraco, Ricardo ;
Escaned, Javier ;
Echavarria-Pinto, Mauro ;
Broyd, Christopher ;
Al-Lamee, Rasha ;
Foin, Nicolas ;
Foale, Rodney A. ;
Malik, Iqbal S. ;
Mikhail, Ghada W. ;
Sethi, Amarjit S. ;
Al-Bustami, Mahmud ;
Kaprielian, Raffi R. ;
Khan, Masood A. ;
Baker, Christopher S. ;
Bellamy, Michael F. ;
Hughes, Alun D. ;
Mayet, Jamil ;
Francis, Darrel P. ;
Di Mario, Carlo ;
Davies, Justin E. R. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (12) :1386-1396
[23]  
Nishimura RA, 2014, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V63, P2438, DOI [10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.537, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.014, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536]
[24]   Right atrial pressure: Can it be ignored when calculating fractional flow reserve and collateral flow index? [J].
Perera, D ;
Biggart, S ;
Postema, P ;
Patel, S ;
Lambiase, P ;
Marber, M ;
Redwood, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (10) :2089-2091
[25]   Pre-Angioplasty Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Pullback and Virtual Revascularization The Pressure Wire as Crystal Ball [J].
Piek, Jan J. ;
van de Hoef, Tim P. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (12) :1397-1399
[26]   Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement - cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography [J].
Rajappan, K ;
Bellenger, NG ;
Melina, G ;
Di Terlizzi, M ;
Yacoub, MH ;
Sheridan, DJ ;
Pennell, DJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 24 (01) :59-65
[27]   Functional changes in coronary microcirculation after valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis [J].
Rajappan, K ;
Rimoldi, OE ;
Camici, PG ;
Bellenger, NG ;
Pennell, DJ ;
Sheridan, DJ .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (25) :3170-3175
[28]   Anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an update [J].
Rex, Steffen .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 26 (04) :456-466
[29]   Acute regional improvement of myocardial function after interventional transfemoral aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis: A speckle tracking echocardiography study [J].
Schattke, Sebastian ;
Baldenhofer, Gerd ;
Prauka, Ines ;
Zhang, Kun ;
Laule, Michael ;
Stangl, Verena ;
Sanad, Wasiem ;
Spethmann, Sebastian ;
Borges, Adrian C. ;
Baumann, Gert ;
Stangl, Karl ;
Knebel, Fabian .
CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND, 2012, 10
[30]   MORPHOMETRIC INVESTIGATION OF HUMAN MYOCARDIUM IN ARTERIAL-HYPERTENSION AND VALVULAR AORTIC-STENOSIS [J].
SCHWARTZKOPFF, B ;
FRENZEL, H ;
DIECKERHOFF, J ;
BETZ, P ;
FLASSHOVE, M ;
SCHULTE, HD ;
MUNDHENKE, M ;
MOTZ, W ;
STRAUER, BE .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1992, 13 :17-23