Impact of Aortic Valve Stenosis on Coronary Hemodynamics and the Instantaneous Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

被引:80
作者
Wiegerinck, Esther M. A. [1 ]
van de Hoef, Tim P. [1 ]
Rolandi, M. Cristina [1 ]
Yong, ZeYie [1 ]
van Kesteren, Floortje [1 ]
Koch, Karel T. [1 ]
Vis, Marije M. [1 ]
de Mol, Bas A. J. M. [1 ]
Piek, Jan J. [1 ]
Baan, Jan, Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, AMC Heartctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
aortic valve stenosis; coronary circulation; coronary microvascular function; coronary microvascular resistance; coronary physiology; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; FREE RATIO PULLBACK; ARTERY-DISEASE; MICROVASCULAR RESISTANCE; COLLATERAL FLOW; REPLACEMENT; PRESSURE; INTERVENTION; OUTCOMES; REVASCULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002443
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Aortic valve stenosis (AS) induces compensatory alterations in left ventricular hemodynamics, leading to physiological and pathological alterations in coronary hemodynamics. Relief of AS by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) decreases ventricular afterload and is expected to improve microvascular function immediately. We evaluated the effect of AS on coronary hemodynamics and the immediate effect of TAVI. Methods and Results Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity were simultaneously assessed at rest and at maximal hyperemia in an unobstructed coronary artery in 27 patients with AS before and immediately after TAVI and in 28 patients without AS. Baseline flow velocity was higher and baseline microvascular resistance was lower in patients with AS as compared with controls, which remained unaltered post-TAVI. In patients with AS, hyperemic flow velocity was significantly lower as compared with controls (44.514.5 versus 54.3 +/- 18.6 cm/s; P=0.04). Hyperemic microvascular resistance (expressed in mm Hgcms(-1)) was 2.10 +/- 0.69 in patients with AS as compared with 1.80 +/- 0.60 in controls (P=0.096). Coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with AS was lower, 1.9 +/- 0.5 versus 2.7 +/- 0.7 in controls (P<0.001). Improvement in coronary hemodynamics after TAVI was most pronounced in patients without post-TAVI aortic regurgitation. In these patients (n=20), hyperemic flow velocity increased significantly from 46.24 +/- 15.47 pre-TAVI to 56.56 +/- 17.44 cm/s post-TAVI (P=0.003). Hyperemic microvascular resistance decreased from 2.03 +/- 0.71 to 1.66 +/- 0.45 (P=0.050). Coronary flow velocity reserve increased significantly from 1.9 +/- 0.4 to 2.2 +/- 0.6 (P=0.009). Conclusions The vasodilatory reserve capacity of the coronary circulation is reduced in AS. TAVI induces an immediate decrease in hyperemic microvascular resistance and a concomitant increase in hyperemic flow velocity, resulting in immediate improvement in coronary vasodilatory reserve.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   New insights into the pathophysiology, classification, and diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction [J].
Ahmed, Bina .
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2014, 25 (05) :439-449
[2]   YPrognostic Value of Coronary Flow Reserve in Asymptomatic Moderate or Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Nonobstructed Coronary Arteries [J].
Marko, Banovic ;
Bosiljka, Vujisic-Tesic ;
Voin, Brkovic ;
Milan, Petrovic ;
Ivana, Nedeljkovic ;
Dejana, Popovic ;
Danijela, Trifunovic ;
Serjan, Nikolic .
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2014, 31 (04) :428-433
[3]   Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment [J].
Camici, Paolo G. ;
d'Amati, Giulia ;
Rimoldi, Ornella .
NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 12 (01) :48-62
[4]   Invasively Assessed Coronary Flow Dynamics Improve Following Relief of Aortic Stenosis With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [J].
Camuglia, Anthony C. ;
Syed, Jaffer ;
Garg, Pallav ;
Kiaii, Bob ;
Chu, Michael W. ;
Jones, Philip M. ;
Bainbridge, Daniel ;
Teefy, Patrick J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (17) :1808-1809
[5]   Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease [J].
Chamuleau, SAJ ;
Siebes, M ;
Meuwissen, M ;
Koch, KT ;
Spaan, JAE ;
Piek, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 285 (05) :H2194-H2200
[6]   Prognostic implication of Doppler echocardiographic derived coronary flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block [J].
Cortigiani, Lauro ;
Rigo, Fausto ;
Gherardi, Sonia ;
Bovenzi, Francesco ;
Molinaro, Sabrina ;
Picano, Eugenio ;
Sicari, Rosa .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (05) :364-373
[7]   Myocardial deformation in aortic valve stenosis: relation to left ventricular geometry [J].
Cramariuc, Dana ;
Gerdts, Eva ;
Davidsen, Einar Skulstad ;
Segadal, Leidulf ;
Matre, Knut .
HEART, 2010, 96 (02) :106-112
[8]   Arterial Pulse Wave Dynamics After Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement Fall in Coronary Diastolic Suction With Increasing Heart Rate as a Basis for Angina Symptoms in Aortic Stenosis [J].
Davies, Justin E. ;
Sen, Sayan ;
Broyd, Chris ;
Hadjiloizou, Nearchos ;
Baksi, John ;
Francis, Darrel P. ;
Foale, Rodney A. ;
Parker, Kim H. ;
Hughes, Alun D. ;
Chukwuemeka, Andrew ;
Casula, Roberto ;
Malik, Iqbal S. ;
Mikhail, Ghada W. ;
Mayet, Jamil .
CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (14) :1565-1572
[9]   Standardized Hyperemic Stress for Fractional Flow Reserve [J].
De Bruyne, Bernard ;
Gould, K. Lance .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (06) :602-603
[10]   Effect of Concomitant Coronary Artery Disease on Procedural and Late Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [J].
Dewey, Todd M. ;
Brown, David L. ;
Herbert, Morley A. ;
Culica, Dan ;
Smith, Craig R. ;
Leon, Martin B. ;
Svensson, Lars G. ;
Tuzcu, Murat ;
Webb, John G. ;
Cribier, Alain ;
Mack, Michael J. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 89 (03) :758-767