Factors predicting work status 3 months after injury: results from the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study

被引:42
作者
Lilley, Rebbecca [1 ]
Davie, Gabrielle [1 ]
Ameratunga, Shanthi [2 ]
Derrett, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Injury Prevent Res Unit, Dept Prevent & Social Med, Dunedin Sch Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Epidemiol & Biostat Sect, Sch Populat Hlth, Auckland 1, New Zealand
关键词
POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; RETURN-TO-WORK; RISK-FACTORS; HEALTH; DETERMINANTS; DISABILITY; EMPLOYMENT; WORKPLACE; CONSEQUENCES; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000400
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Few studies examine predictors of work status following injury beyond injuries presenting to a hospital or emergency department. This paper examines the combined influences of socio-demographic, occupational, injury and pre-existing health and lifestyle factors as predictors of work status 3 months after hospitalised and non-hospitalised injury in a cohort of injured New Zealand workers. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: The Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study, New Zealand. Participants: 2626 workforce active participants were identified from the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study; 11 participants with missing outcome responses were excluded. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome of interest was not working' at the time of interview. Results: 720 (27%) reported not working' 3 months after injury. The most important pre-injury predictors of not working following injury found by multidimensional modelling were as follows: low or unknown income, financial insecurity, physical work tasks, temporary employment, long week schedules, obesity, perceived threat to life and hospital admission. Contrary to expectations, workers reporting less frequent exercise pre-injury had lower odds of work absence. Pre-injury psychosocial and health factors were not associated with not working. Conclusion: Certain pre-injury socio-demographic, physical work, work organisation, lifestyle and injury-related factors were associated with not working 3 months after injury. If these findings are confirmed, intervention strategies aimed at improving return to work should address multiple dimensions of both the worker and the workplace.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Accident Compensation Corporation, 2009, ANN REP 2009
[2]   An introduction to the Barell body region by nature of injury diagnosis matrix [J].
Barell, V ;
Aharonson-Daniel, L ;
Fingerhut, LA ;
Mackenzie, EJ ;
Ziv, A ;
Boyko, V ;
Abargel, A ;
Avitzour, M ;
Heruti, R .
INJURY PREVENTION, 2002, 8 (02) :91-96
[3]   Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda [J].
Benach, J. ;
Muntaner, C. .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2007, 61 (04) :276-277
[4]   Return to work after lower limb amputation [J].
Burger, Helena ;
Marincek, Crt .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2007, 29 (17) :1323-1329
[5]   A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma [J].
Clay, Fiona J. ;
Newstead, Stuart V. ;
McClure, Roderick J. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2010, 41 (08) :787-803
[6]   DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO WORK FOLLOWING NON-LIFE-THREATENING ACUTE ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY [J].
Clay, Fiona J. ;
Newstead, Stuart V. ;
Watson, Wendy L. ;
McClure, Roderick J. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (02) :162-169
[7]   Meta-Analysis of Workplace Physical Activity Interventions [J].
Conn, Vicki S. ;
Hafdahl, Adam R. ;
Cooper, Pamela S. ;
Brown, Lori M. ;
Lusk, Sally L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (04) :330-339
[8]  
Crichton S, 2005, RETURNING WORK INJUR, P12
[9]   The social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses [J].
Dembe, AE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2001, 40 (04) :403-417
[10]   Associations between employees' work schedules and the vocational consequences of workplace injuries [J].
Dembe, Allard E. ;
Delbos, Rachel ;
Erickson, J. Bianca ;
Banks, Steven M. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2007, 17 (04) :641-651