Evaluation of Patient-reported Quality-of-life Outcomes After Renal Surgery

被引:18
作者
Kim, Sarah B.
Williams, Stephen B.
Cheng, Su-Chun
Sanda, Martin G.
Wagner, Andrew A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Med, Div Urol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
RECOVERY EVALUATION CARE; CELL CARCINOMA; PROSTATE-CANCER; HEALTH SURVEY; VALIDATION; CONVALESCENCE; NEPHRECTOMY; IMPACT; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of 2 patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments, Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE), and SF-12, as tools for evaluating HRQOL outcome consequences after renal surgery, and to determine which domains of these HRQOL instruments are most sensitive to HRQOL outcome effects of renal surgery. METHODS Patients completed CARE and SF-12 preoperatively (baseline) and at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. Clinical data, patient response rate, HRQOL changes over time, and likelihood of patient return to baseline HRQOL were evaluated. RESULTS Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Sixty patients completed the baseline and at least 1 follow-up set of questionnaires. The CARE pain, gastrointestinal (GI), and activity domain scores and the SF-12 physical composite score (PCS) were sensitive to changes in HRQOL (all P<.05), whereas other domain subscores of these instruments did not change from presurgical baseline to postsurgical follow-up. Postsurgical HRQOL effects detected by the CARE pain, GI, and activity domains, and SF-12 PCS were most evident at 2 weeks (all P<.001). The CARE composite score demonstrated that 74% and 50% of patients returned to within 90% of baseline 4 weeks after radical and partial nephrectomy, respectively. CONCLUSION Evaluation of patient-reported HRQOL outcomes after renal surgery is feasible; our findings suggest that the activity, pain, and GI domains of CARE and PCS subscores of the SF-12 are sensitive measures of HRQOL outcome consequences of renal surgery and represent appropriate measures of either care quality or comparative effectiveness analyses of robotic, laparoscopic, and open renal surgery. UROLOGY 79: 1268-1273, 2012. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1268 / 1273
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]   An analysis of sexual health information on radical prostatectomy websites [J].
Mulhall, John P. ;
Rojaz-Cruz, Cesar ;
Mueller, Alexander .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (01) :68-72
[12]   Factors Predicting Health-Related Quality of Life Recovery in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Renal Tumors: Prospective Evaluation Using the RAND SF-36 Health Survey [J].
Novara, Giacomo ;
Secco, Silvia ;
Botteri, Maria ;
De Marco, Vincenzo ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Ficarra, Vincenzo .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (01) :112-120
[13]   Assessment of health-related quality of life after radiofrequency ablation or laparoscopic surgery for small renal cell carcinoma: A prospective study with medical outcomes study 36-item health survey (SF-36) [J].
Onishi, Takehisa ;
Nishikawa, Kouhei ;
Hasegawa, Yoshihiro ;
Yamada, Yasushi ;
Soga, Norihito ;
Arima, Kiminobu ;
Yamakado, Koichiro ;
Hoshina, Akira ;
Sugimura, Yoshiki .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 37 (10) :750-754
[14]   Quality of life after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: Comparison between radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery [J].
Poulakis, V ;
Witzsch, U ;
De Vries, R ;
Moeckel, M ;
Becht, E .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (05) :814-820
[15]   Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer - A randomized trial [J].
Weeks, JC ;
Nelson, H ;
Gelber, S ;
Sargent, D ;
Schroeder, G .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (03) :321-328
[16]   Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer [J].
Wei, JT ;
Dunn, RL ;
Litwin, MS ;
Sandler, HM ;
Sanda, MG .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (06) :899-905