Fundamental Dimensions of Subjective State in Performance Settings: Task Engagement, Distress, and Worry

被引:327
作者
Matthews, Gerald [1 ]
Campbell, Sian E. [2 ]
Falconer, Shona [3 ]
Joyner, Lucy A. [3 ]
Huggins, Jane [3 ]
Gilliland, Kirby [4 ]
Grier, Rebecca [1 ]
Warm, Joel S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Psychol, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] Wolverhampton Univ, Dept Psychol, Wolverhampton WV1 1DJ, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Dundee, Dept Psychol, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037//1528-3542.2.4.315
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Subjective state constructs are defined within the traditional domains of affect, motivation, and cognition. Currently, there is no overarching state model that interrelates constructs within the different domains. This article reports 3 studies that provide converging evidence for 3 fundamental state dimensions labeled task engagement, distress, and worry that integrate constructs across the traditional domains. Study 1 differentiated the state dimensions by factor analysis of the scales of the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (G. Matthews et al., 1999). Study 2 showed differential state response to performance of tasks making different cognitive demands. Study 3 showed that states are correlated with differing patterns of appraisal and coping. The 3 stress state dimensions provide a general descriptive framework consistent with transactional accounts of stress and performance.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 340
页数:26
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ADV PERSONAL PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315812175
[2]  
[Anonymous], HDB COPING THEORY RE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1976, MODERN FACTOR ANAL
[4]  
BHAGAT RS, 1995, OCCUPATIONAL STRESS, P93
[5]   ORIGINS AND FUNCTIONS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT - A CONTROL-PROCESS VIEW [J].
CARVER, CS ;
SCHEIER, MF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (01) :19-35
[6]  
Cattell RB., 1973, PERSONALITY MOOD QUE
[7]  
Clore G.L., 2000, SER AFFECTIVE SCI, P24
[8]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
[9]  
Costa P.T., 1996, Handbook of coping, P44
[10]  
Dweck CarolS., 1999, SELF THEORIES THEIR