Long-term outcome and quality of life after supercharged jejunal interposition for oesophageal replacement

被引:19
作者
Baker, Cara R. [1 ]
Forshaw, Matthew J. [2 ]
Gossage, James A. [1 ]
Ng, R. [3 ]
Mason, Robert C. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Thomas Hosp, Dept Upper GI Surg, London, England
[2] Royal Infirm, Reg Oesophagogastr Unit, Glasgow G31 2ER, Lanark, Scotland
[3] St Thomas Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, London, England
来源
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND | 2015年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
Oesophagectomy; Conduit necrosis; Supercharged jejunal interposition; REFERENCE VALUES; RECONSTRUCTION; SURGERY; QLQ-C30;
D O I
10.1016/j.surge.2014.01.004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The consequences of major conduit necrosis following oesophagectomy are devastating. Jejunal interposition with vascular supercharging is an alternative reconstructive method if colon is unavailable. Aims of this study were to review the long-term outcome and quality of life of patients undergoing this surgery in our tertiary unit. Methods: Patients undergoing oesophageal reconstruction with supercharged jejunum were identified and retrospective review of hospital notes performed. Each patient was then interviewed for follow up data and quality of life assessment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results: Six patients (5 men) (median age 59 years (range 34-72) underwent supercharged pedicled jejunal (SPJ) interposition from May 2005-August 2010. Indications for surgery were loss of both gastric and colonic conduits following surgery for oesophageal cancer (n = 4), loss of gastric conduit and previous colectomy (n = 1) and lastly, gastric and colonic infarction in a strangulated paraoesophageal hernia (n = 1). Median time to reconstruction was 12 months [6-15 range]. There were no in-hospital deaths. Median postoperative stay was 46 days [13-118]. Three patients required surgical re-intervention for leak, sepsis and reflux, respectively. Median follow up was 6.5 years [range 7-102 months]. One patient died seven months following surgery due to respiratory complications. On follow up, 5 patients have an enteral diet without supplemental nutrition, maintaining weight and good quality of life scores. Conclusions: Supercharged jejunal interposition is a suitable alternative conduit for delayed oesophageal replacement in patients with otherwise limited reconstructive options. Good functional outcomes can be achieved despite formidable technical challenges in this group. (C) 2014 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 193
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[11]  
LONGMIRE WP, 1951, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V93, P310
[12]   Long-term experiences after oesophagectomy/gastrectomy for cancer-A focus group study [J].
Malmstrom, Marlene ;
Ivarsson, Bodil ;
Johansson, Jan ;
Klefsgard, Rosemarie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2013, 50 (01) :44-52
[13]  
Sekido M, 2006, Rozhl Chir, V85, P9
[14]   The Supercharged Microvascular Jejunal Interposition [J].
Swisher, Stephen G. ;
Hofstetter, Wayne L. ;
Miller, Michael J. .
SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 19 (01) :56-65
[15]   Reference values of oesophago-gastric symptoms (EORTC QLQ-OG25) in a population-based setting [J].
van der Schaaf, Maartje ;
Derogar, Maryam ;
Lagergren, Pernilla .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (11) :1602-1607
[16]  
Wormuth Jennifer K, 2006, Thorac Surg Clin, V16, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.01.003
[17]   Impact of the method of reconstruction after oncologic oesophagectomy on quality of life - a prospective, randomised study [J].
Zhang, Cheng ;
Wu, Qing-Chen ;
Hou, Peng-Yuan ;
Zhang, Min ;
Li, Qiang ;
Jiang, Ying-Jiu ;
Chen, Dan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 39 (01) :109-114