The Perth Surgical Wound Dehiscence Risk Assessment Tool (PSWDRAT): development and prospective validation in the clinical setting

被引:9
作者
Sandy-Hodgetts, Kylie [1 ]
Caryille, Keryln [1 ]
Santamaria, Nick [1 ]
Parsons, Richard [1 ]
Leslie, Gavin D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, King Edward Mem Hosp, Fac Med, Sch Biomed Sci,Burn Injury Res Unit,UWA Dept Obst, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
prediction model; preoperative risk assessment; receiver operator curve; surgical wound dehiscence; surgical wound dehiscence risk assessment tool; SITE INFECTION; COMPLICATIONS; SMOKING; HERNIA; SURVEILLANCE; PREDICTION; SCORE; SURGERY; SYSTEM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.12968/jowc.2019.28.6.332
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective: The worldwide volume of surgery today is considerable and postoperative wound healing plays a significant part in facilitating a patient's recovery and rehabilitation. While contemporary surgical procedures are relatively safe, complications such as surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) or breakdown of the incision site may occur despite advances in surgical techniques, infection control practices and wound care. SWD impacts on patient mortality and morbidity and significantly contributes to prolonged hospital stay. Preoperative identification of patients at risk of SWD may be valuable in reducing the risk of postoperative wound complications. Method: A three-phase study was undertaken to determine risk factors associated with SWD, develop a preoperative patient risk assessment tool and to prospectively validate the tool in a clinical setting. Phases 1 and 2 were retrospective case control studies. Phase 1 determined variables associated with SWD and these informed the development of a risk assessment tool. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression were applied to identify predictors of surgical risk. Phase 2 used the receiver operator curve statistic to determine the predictive power of the tool. Phase 3 involved a prospective consecutive case series validation to test the inter-rater reliability and predictive power of the tool. Results: In addition to those already identified in the literature, one independent risk predictor for SWD was identified: previous surgery in the same anatomical location (p< 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 4). Multiple combined factors were integrated into the tool and included: age (p< 0.019, OR 3), diabetes (p< 0.624, OR 2), obesity (p< 0.94, OR 1.4), smoking (p< 0.387, OR 2), cardiovascular disease (p< 0.381 OR 3) and peripheral arterial disease (p< 0.501, OR 3). The predictive power of the tool yielded 71% in a combined data sample. Conclusion: Patients with previous surgery in the same anatomical location were four times more likely to incur a dehiscence. Identification of at- risk patients for complications postoperatively is integral to reducing SWD occurrence and improving health- related outcomes following surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 344
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HDB RES METHODS NURS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Psychological testing
[3]   CeDAR: Carolinas Equation for Determining Associated Risks [J].
Augenstein, Vedra A. ;
Colavita, Paul D. ;
Wormer, Blair A. ;
Walters, Amanda L. ;
Bradley, Joel F. ;
Lincourt, Amy E. ;
Horton, James ;
Heniford, B. Todd .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 221 (04) :S65-S66
[4]   Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery [J].
Basha, Suzanne L. ;
Rochon, Meredith L. ;
Quinones, Joanne N. ;
Coassolo, Kara M. ;
Rust, Orion A. ;
Smulian, John C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (03) :285.e1-285.e8
[5]   Development and Validation of a Risk-Stratification Score for Surgical Site Occurrence and Surgical Site Infection after Open Ventral Hernia Repair [J].
Berger, Rachel L. ;
Li, Linda T. ;
Hicks, Stephanie C. ;
Davila, Jessica A. ;
Kao, Lillian S. ;
Liang, Mike K. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (06) :974-982
[6]   Staples versus sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery. [J].
Biancari, Fausto ;
Tiozzo, Valentina .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (05)
[7]   Deep sternal wound infection: Risk factors and outcomes [J].
Borger, MA ;
Rao, V ;
Weisel, RD ;
Ivanov, J ;
Cohen, G ;
Scully, HE ;
David, TE .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 65 (04) :1050-1056
[8]   BURST ABDOMEN AND INCISIONAL HERNIA - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 1129 MAJOR LAPAROTOMIES [J].
BUCKNALL, TE ;
COX, PJ ;
ELLIS, H .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 284 (6320) :931-933
[9]   An update review on risk factors and scales for prediction of deep sternal wound infections [J].
Buja, Alessandra ;
Zampieron, Alessandra ;
Cavalet, Sara ;
Chiffi, Daniele ;
Sandona, Paolo ;
Vinelli, Angela ;
Baldovin, Tatjana ;
Baldo, Vincenzo .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2012, 9 (04) :372-386
[10]  
Carville K, 2007, WOUND CARE MANUAL, V5th