Numerical study of dynamic Smagorinsky models in large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: Validation in stable and unstable conditions

被引:59
|
作者
Kleissl, Jan
Kumar, Vijayant
Meneveau, Charles
Parlange, Marc B.
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Environm & Appl Fluid Mech, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Architecture Civil & Environm Engn, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005WR004685
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
[ 1] Large-eddy simulation (LES) of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) flow is performed over a homogeneous surface with different heat flux forcings. The goal is to test the performance of dynamic subgrid-scale models in a numerical framework and to compare the results with those obtained in a recent field experimental study ( HATS ( Kleissl et al., 2004)). In the dynamic model the Smagorinsky coefficient c(s) is obtained from test filtering and analysis of the resolved large scales during the simulation. In the scale-invariant dynamic model the coefficient is independent of filter scale, and the scale-dependent model does not require this assumption. Both approaches provide realistic results of mean vertical profiles in an unstable boundary layer. The advantages of the scale-dependent model become evident in the simulation of a stable boundary layer and in the velocity and temperature spectra of both stable and unstable cases. To compare numerical results with HATS data, a simulation of the evolution of the ABL during a diurnal cycle is performed. The numerical prediction of c(s) from the scale-invariant model is too small, whereas the coefficients obtained from the scale-dependent version of the model are consistent with results from HATS. LES of the ABL using the scale-dependent dynamic model give reliable results for mean profiles and spectra at stable, neutral, and unstable atmospheric stabilities. However, simulations under strongly stable conditions ( horizontal filter size divided by Obukhov length > 3.8) display instabilities due to basic flaws in the eddy viscosity closure, no matter how accurately the coefficient is determined.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Large-Eddy Simulation of the Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layer using Dynamic Models with Different Averaging Schemes
    Rob Stoll
    Fernando Porté-Agel
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2008, 126 : 1 - 28
  • [2] Large-eddy simulation of the stable atmospheric boundary layer using dynamic models with different averaging schemes
    Stoll, Rob
    Porte-Agel, Fernando
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2008, 126 (01) : 1 - 28
  • [3] Large-Eddy Simulation of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
    Rob Stoll
    Jeremy A. Gibbs
    Scott T. Salesky
    William Anderson
    Marc Calaf
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2020, 177 : 541 - 581
  • [4] Large-Eddy Simulation of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
    Stoll, Rob
    Gibbs, Jeremy A.
    Salesky, Scott T.
    Anderson, William
    Calaf, Marc
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2020, 177 (2-3) : 541 - 581
  • [5] On the application of the dynamic Smagorinsky model to large-eddy simulations of the cloud-topped atmospheric boundary layer
    Kirkpatrick, MP
    Ackerman, AS
    Stevens, DE
    Mansour, NN
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2006, 63 (02) : 526 - 546
  • [6] Large-eddy simulation of a very large wind farm in a stable atmospheric boundary layer
    Lu, Hao
    Porte-Agel, Fernando
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2011, 23 (06)
  • [7] Large-eddy simulation of wind-blown sand under unstable atmospheric boundary layer
    He, Panli
    Zhang, Jie
    Herrmann, Hans J.
    Huang, Ning
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2022, 67 (14) : 1421 - 1424
  • [9] Local dynamic gradient Smagorinsky model for large-eddy simulation
    Rozema, Wybe
    Bae, H. Jane
    Verstappen, Roel W. C. P.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2022, 7 (07)
  • [10] A Large-Eddy Simulation Study of Scalar Dissimilarity in the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer
    Cancelli, Diana M.
    Chamecki, Marcelo
    Dias, Nelson L.
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2014, 71 (01) : 3 - 15