Exterior girder rotation of skew and non-skew bridges during construction

被引:2
|
作者
Ashiquzzaman, Md [1 ]
Hui, Li [2 ]
Ibrahim, Ahmed [3 ]
Lindquist, Will [4 ]
Panahshahi, Nader [5 ]
Hindi, Riyadh [6 ]
机构
[1] DOTec Corp, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Univ Louisiana Lafayette, Dept Civil Engn, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 875 Perimeter Dr, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[4] William Jewell Coll, Liberty, MO USA
[5] Southern Illinois Univ Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL USA
[6] St Louis Univ, Grad Programs, Pk Coll Engn Aviat & Technol, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
deck differential deflection; deck overhang; girder rotation; skewed and non-skewed bridge; steel girder;
D O I
10.1177/1369433220945061
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In bridge design, bridge decks regularly overhang past the exterior girders in arrange to extend the width of the deck whereas constraining the specified number of girders. The overhanging part of the deck comes about in uneven eccentric loads to the exterior girders which are by and large most prominent. These eccentric loads are primarily a result of bridge construction operations as well as the weight of new concrete and other construction live loads. These unbalanced loads can lead to a differential edge deflection of overhang deck and a rotation of the exterior girders. The girder rotation or differential deck deflection can also affect local and global stability of the entire bridge. The objective of this study is to enhance the knowledge and understanding of external girder behavior due to unbalanced eccentric construction loads and to identify the critical factors affecting their rotation. In this article, field data obtained during the construction of two skewed (one with a small skew (3.8 degrees) and the second with a severe skew (24 degrees)) and one non-skewed steel girder bridges are described, and a detailed comparison is presented. The three bridges experienced maximum outward exterior girder rotation during construction which subsequently decreased following construction operations. The field results were used to validate and calibrate the finite element models. The numerical and field-monitored data showed good agreement and can be used to assist bridge designers and construction engineers to design appropriate systems to limit girder rotation during construction.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 146
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Limiting exterior girder rotation during construction for non-skewed bridges
    Hui, L.
    Hraib, F.
    Hindi, R.
    MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, RISK, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE OF BRIDGES, 2018, : 1456 - 1461
  • [2] DIAPHRAGMS IN SKEW BOX GIRDER BRIDGES
    DILGER, WH
    GHONEIM, GA
    TADROS, GS
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1988, 15 (05) : 869 - 878
  • [3] DECK SLABS OF SKEW GIRDER BRIDGES
    BAKHT, B
    AGARWAL, AC
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1995, 22 (03) : 514 - 523
  • [4] A Simplified method to minimize exterior girder rotation of steel bridges during deck construction
    Hui, Li
    Hraib, Faress
    Gillis, Brandon
    Vicente, Miguel
    Hindi, Riyadh
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 183 : 84 - 93
  • [5] Girder moments in continuous skew composite bridges
    Univ of Windsor, Windsor, Canada
    J Bridge Eng, 1 (37-45):
  • [6] Evaluation of bridge exterior girder rotation during construction
    Hraib, Faress
    Hui, Li
    Vicente, Miguel
    Hindi, Riyadh
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 187 : 149 - 160
  • [7] NON-SKEW SYMMETRIC ORTHOGONAL MATRICES WITH CONSTANT DIAGONALS
    LAM, CWH
    DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 1983, 43 (01) : 65 - 78
  • [8] Parameter Analysis for Skew Angle on the Seismic Torsion Effect of Continuous Skew Girder Bridges
    Lu, Mingqi
    Liao, Xing
    Cao, Xiangzong
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL VIBRATION, 2011, : 465 - 470
  • [9] On skew preference or non-skew preference of a CPT DM revealed in lottery choices with three payoffs
    Peel, David
    Zhang, Jie
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 235
  • [10] Girder moments in simply supported skew composite bridges
    Ebeido, T
    Kennedy, JB
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1996, 23 (04) : 904 - 916