What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research

被引:76
作者
Driessen, Erik [1 ]
Scheele, Fedde [2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] St Lucas Andreas Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
WORKPLACE-BASED ASSESSMENT; PROGRAMMATIC ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; JUNIOR DOCTORS; COMPETENCE; FEEDBACK; PERSPECTIVES; QUESTIONS; OUTCOMES; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2013.798403
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Workplace-based assessment is more commonly given a lukewarm than a warm welcome by its prospective users. In this article, we summarise the workplace-based assessment literature as well as our own experiences with workplace-based assessment to derive lessons that can facilitate acceptance of workplace-based assessment in postgraduate specialty training. We propose to shift the emphasis in workplace-based assessment from assessment of trainee performance to the learning of trainees. Workplace-based assessment should focus on supporting supervisors in taking entrustment decisions by complementing their "gut feeling" with information from assessments and focus less on assessment and testability. One of the most stubborn problems with workplace-based assessment is the absence of observation of trainees and the lack of feedback based on observations. Non-standardised observations are used to organise feedback. To make these assessments meaningful for learning, it is essential that they are not perceived as summative by their users, that they provide narrative feedback for the learner and that there is a form of facilitation that helps to integrate the feedback in trainees' self-assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 574
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Student perspectives on assessment: Experience in a competency-based portfolio system
    Altahawi, Faysal
    Sisk, Bryan
    Poloskey, Stacey
    Hicks, Caitlin
    Dannefer, Elaine F.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (03) : 221 - 225
  • [2] State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback
    Archer, Julian C.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [3] How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors
    Bullock, Alison D.
    Hassell, Andrew
    Markham, Wolfgang A.
    Wall, David W.
    Whitehouse, Andrew B.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 43 (06) : 516 - 520
  • [4] Making sense of work-based assessment: ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people
    Crossley, Jim
    Jolly, Brian
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [5] Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales
    Crossley, Jim
    Johnson, Gavin
    Booth, Joe
    Wade, Winnie
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (06) : 560 - 569
  • [6] Assessment of competence and progressive independence in postgraduate clinical training
    Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K.
    Voorhuis, Marlies
    Teunissen, Pim W.
    Schuwirth, Lambert W. T.
    ten Cate, Olle T. J.
    Braat, Didi D. M.
    Scheele, Fedde
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 43 (12) : 1156 - 1165
  • [7] Driessen E, 2010, MED ED THEORY PRACTI, P211
  • [8] Teaching rounds - The self critical doctor: helping students become more reflective
    Driessen, Erik
    van Tartwijk, Jan
    Dornan, Tim
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7648): : 827 - 830
  • [9] Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review
    Driessen, Erik
    van Tartwijk, Jan
    van der Vleuten, Cees
    Wass, Val
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (12) : 1224 - 1233
  • [10] The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: A Maastricht case report
    Driessen, Erik W.
    van Tartwijk, Jan
    Govaerts, Marjan
    Teunissen, Pim
    van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (03) : 226 - 231