The effect of nonverbal cues on relationship formation

被引:18
作者
Kotlyar, Igor [1 ]
Ariely, Dan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Inst Technol, Fac Business & IT, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[2] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
Communication; Non-verbal cues; Impression formation; Avatar; Relationship; Gender; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; SELF-DISCLOSURE; REAL ME; ONLINE; IDENTITY; INTERNET; LIFE; SEE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.020
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An unprecedented number of relationships begin online, propelling online dating into a billion-dollar industry. However, while the online dating industry has created an effective mechanism for matching and accessing profiles, it has largely neglected the quality of communication between individuals. We investigate whether the lack of nonverbal cues (inherent in the text-based communication tools commonly used by dating sites) hinders communication and relationship formation. In this study, members of a dating website interacted through one of four randomly assigned versions of a text chat, where each version featured an increasing number of nonverbal communication cues. A survey was then administered regarding users' perceptions of each other, the level and quality of information disclosure, and their interest in developing a relationship with the other person. Results suggest that restoring nonverbal cues through the use of avatars can help improve online interaction and relationship formation. Chat versions that featured more nonverbal cues were associated with more favorable perceptions, greater exchange of information, and a stronger desire to pursue a relationship. While both genders found nonverbal communication conducive to developing a relationship, men and women reacted differently to certain types of nonverbal communication. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 551
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]  
Mintz A.P., 2002, WEB DECEPTION MISINF
[42]   Less is more: The lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt [J].
Norton, Michael I. ;
Frost, Jeana H. ;
Ariely, Dan .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (01) :97-105
[43]  
Parks M.R., 1996, J COMPUTER MEDIATED, V1
[44]   When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication [J].
Ramirez, Artemio, Jr. ;
Zhang, Shuangyue .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2007, 74 (03) :287-310
[45]   The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating [J].
Rosen, Larry D. ;
Cheever, Nancy A. ;
Curnmings, Cheyenne ;
Felt, Julie .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2008, 24 (05) :2124-2157
[46]  
Rutter D.R., 1987, COMMUNICATING TELEPH
[47]   PERSON MEMORY AND JUDGMENT [J].
SRULL, TK ;
WYER, RS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (01) :58-83
[48]   When cultures and computers collide - Rethinking computer-mediated communication according to international and intercultural communication expectations [J].
St Amant, K .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2002, 16 (02) :196-214
[49]   Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC [J].
Tanis, Martin ;
Postmes, Tom .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2007, 23 (02) :955-970
[50]  
Thalmann D, 2001, FRONTIERS OF HUMAN-CENTRED COMPUTING, ONLINE COMMUNITIES AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, P27