Comparison of long-term results between different approaches to ameloblastoma

被引:159
作者
Nakamura, N
Higuchi, Y
Mitsuyasu, T
Sandra, F
Ohishi, M
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Dent Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg 1, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Fac Dent Sci, Div Maxillofacial Diagnost & Surg Sci, Fukuoka 812, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Fac Dent Sci, Div Maxillofacial Diagnost & Surg Sci, Fukuoka 812, Japan
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS | 2002年 / 93卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1067/moe.2002.119517
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The long-term results of different surgical approaches to ameloblastoma were compared to develop a more rational surgical approach to this tumor. Study design. Seventy-eight primary ameloblastomas, including 27 unicystic, 21 multicystic, and 30 solid-type tumors, were examined in this study. The methods of treatment consisted of radical surgery (ie, resection-both segmental and marginal) and conservative treatments (ie, marsupialization alone, marsupialization followed by enucleation with sufficient bone curettage if necessary, and enucleation with bone curettage). The effect of marsupialization on recurrence data after a follow-up period of at least 5 years was evaluated with respect to clinical type and histologic pattern. Results. Marsupialization was performed in 31 cystic ameloblastomas before surgery, and the effective rate of marsupialization was 74.2%. Recurrence was observed in 7.1% (3/42) after radical surgery and in 33.3% (12/36) in conservative treatments. Relatively higher tendencies of recurrence were observed in the multicystic type and follicular and/or plexiform pattern tumors. Conclusions. Conservative treatments including marsupialization and enucleation followed by sufficient bone curettage were thought to be useful, reducing the need for jaw resection. This result extends the indications for conservative treatment of ameloblastoma.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 20
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Cawson RA, 1998, LUCASS PATHOLOGY TUM, P25
[2]   A PATHOLOGISTS APPROACH TO THE TREATMENT OF AMELOBLASTOMA [J].
GARDNER, DG .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1984, 42 (03) :161-166
[3]  
GARDNER DG, 1984, CANCER, V53, P1730, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19840415)53:8<1730::AID-CNCR2820530819>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-U
[5]   UNUSUAL AMELOBLASTOMA WITH EXTENSIVE STROMAL DESMOPLASIA [J].
HIGUCHI, Y ;
NAKAMURA, N ;
OHISHI, M ;
TASHIRO, H .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 19 (07) :323-327
[6]  
KRAMER IRH, 1992, HISTOLOGICAL TYPING, P11
[7]  
MEHLISCH DR, 1972, J ORAL SURG, V30, P9
[8]   Immunohistochemical demonstration of bcl-2 protein in ameloblastoma [J].
Mitsuyasu, T ;
Harada, H ;
Higuchi, Y ;
Kimura, K ;
Nakamura, N ;
Katsuki, T ;
Kubota, E ;
Toyoshima, K ;
Ohishi, M .
JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 1997, 26 (08) :345-348
[9]   THE GROWTH-CHARACTERISTICS OF MULTILOCULAR AMELOBLASTOMAS - A HISTOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION WITH SOME INFERENCES WITH REGARD TO OPERATIVE PROCEDURES [J].
MULLER, H ;
SLOOTWEG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1985, 13 (05) :224-230
[10]   THE AMELOBLASTOMA, THE CONTROVERSIAL APPROACH TO THERAPY [J].
MULLER, H ;
SLOOTWEG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1985, 13 (02) :79-84