How Decisions Emerge: Action Dynamics in Intertemporal Decision Making

被引:92
作者
Dshemuchadse, Maja [1 ]
Scherbaum, Stefan [1 ]
Goschke, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Psychol, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
decision making; temporal discounting; intertemporal choice; action dynamics; date-delay effect; HYPOTHETICAL REWARDS; TIME PERCEPTION; FIELD-THEORY; SELF-CONTROL; DELAY; CHOICE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REAL; PREFERENCE; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1037/a0028499
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In intertemporal decision making, individuals prefer smaller rewards delivered sooner over larger rewards delivered later, often to an extent that seems irrational from an economical perspective. This behavior has been attributed to a lack of self-control and reflection, the nonlinearity of human time perception, and several other sources. Although an increasing number of models propose different mathematical descriptions of temporal discounting, the dynamics of the decision process behind temporal discounting are much less clear. In this study, we obtained further insights into the mechanisms of intertemporal decisions by observing choice action dynamics via a novel combination of continuously recorded mouse movements and a multiple regression approach. Participants had to choose between two hypothetical options (sooner/smaller vs. later/larger) by moving the mouse cursor from the bottom of the screen either to the top left or to the top right. We observed less direct mouse movements when participants chose later/larger rewards, indicating that participants had to overcome the attraction of the sooner/smaller reward first. Additionally, our results suggest that framing time information differently changes the weighting of value. We conclude that using a continuous process-oriented approach could further advance the understanding of intertemporal choice beyond the identification of the best fitted mathematical description of the discounting function by uncovering the way intertemporal decisions are performed.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Decisions Happen: Focal Points and Blind Spots in Interdependent Decision Making
    Halevy, Nir
    Chou, Eileen Y.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 106 (03) : 398 - 417
  • [22] Acute and chronic nicotine effects on behaviour and brain activation during intertemporal decision making
    Kobiella, Andrea
    Ripke, Stephan
    Kroemer, Nils B.
    Vollmert, Christian
    Vollstaedt-Klein, Sabine
    Ulshoefer, Dorothea E.
    Smolka, Michael N.
    ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2014, 19 (05) : 918 - 930
  • [23] A Review of Intertemporal Decision Making in Neuroscience and Psychology: Time Perception, Attentional Resources, and Emotion
    Li, Shan
    Zhou, Minjie
    Attia, Abdelkader
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL 2, 2022, 145 : 652 - 666
  • [24] (Im)patience by proxy: Making intertemporal decisions for others
    Oliveira, Angela C. M. de
    Jacobson, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2021, 182 : 83 - 99
  • [25] Time Is Money: The Decision Making of Smartphone High Users in Gain and Loss Intertemporal Choice
    Tang, Zixuan
    Zhang, Huijun
    Yan, An
    Qu, Chen
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [26] Self-other differences in intertemporal decision making: An eye-tracking investigation
    Sharma, Sathya Narayana
    Khan, Azizuddin
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2022, 102
  • [27] Intertemporal Decision Making: A Mental Load Perspective
    Treur, Jan
    BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES 2012, 2013, 196 : 319 - 331
  • [28] The Group Intertemporal Decision-Making Process
    Sun, Hong-Yue
    Xiao, Yi-Ting
    Yang, Shan-Shan
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (09)
  • [29] Does experience with high inflation affect intertemporal decision making? Sensitivity to inflation rates in Argentine and british delay discounting choices
    Macchia, Lucia
    Plagnol, Anke C.
    Reimers, Stian
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 75 : 76 - 83