A life cycle impact analysis of various hydrogen production methods for public transportation sector

被引：48

作者：

Aydin, Muhammed Iberia ^{[1
,2
]}

Dincer, Ibrahim ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Fac Engn, Environm Engn Dept, TR-34320 Istanbul, Turkey

[2] Ontario Tech Univ, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Clean Energy Res Lab, Oshawa, ON L1G 0CS, Canada

[3] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Mech Engn Dept, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkey

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY | 2022年 / 47卷 / 93期

关键词：

Hydrogen production; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impact; Sustainable development; FUEL-CELL; ELECTROLYSIS SYSTEM; DARK;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.125

中图分类号：

O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];

学科分类号：

070304 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is an important task to reduce the adverse effects of climate change. A large portion of greenhouse gas emissions apparently originates from the transportation sector. Therefore, adopting cleaner technologies with lower emission footprints has become vital. For this reason, in this study, a life cycle impact analysis of hydrogen production technologies as an alternative to fossil fuels and the utilization of hydrogen in fuel cell electric buses is carried out. According to the results of this study, the operational contributions of internal combustion engines have a significant impact on life cycle impact analysis indicators. The global warming potentials of clean hydrogen pro-duction technologies result in much lower results compared to conventional hydrogen production technologies. Also, almost all indicators for biohydrogen production tech-nologiess yield lower results because of the wastewater removal. The global warming potential results of hydrogen production methods are found to be 6.8, 1.9, 2.1, 0.5, 0.2, and 7.9 kg CO2 eq./kg H2 for PV electrolysis, wind electrolysis, high temperature electrolysis,

引用

页码：39666 / 39677

页数：12

共 54 条

[1] Exergy analyses of green hydrogen production methods from biogas-based electricity and sewage sludge [J].

Abusoglu, Aysegul ;

Ozahi, Emrah ;

Kutlar, A. Ihsan ;

Demir, Sinan .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (16) :10986-10996

[2] Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment [J].

Acar, Canan ;

Dincer, Ibrahim .

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 218 :835-849

[3] Impact assessment and efficiency evaluation of hydrogen production methods [J].

Acar, Canan ;

Dincer, Ibrahim .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 39 (13) :1757-1768

[4] A comprehensive review on biological hydrogen production [J].

Akhlaghi, Neda ;

Najafpour-Darzi, Ghasem .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (43) :22492-22512

[5] Exergoeconomic analysis of hydrogen production using a standalone high-temperature electrolyzer [J].

AlZahrani, Abdullah A. ;

Dincer, Ibrahim .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (27) :13899-13907

[6] Modeling and performance optimization of a solid oxide electrolysis system for hydrogen production [J].

AlZahrani, Abdullah A. ;

Dincer, Ibrahim .

APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 225 :471-485

[7]

[Anonymous], 2020, Road Map to a US Hydrogen Economy

[8]

[Anonymous], 2013, EC EC DAT 3 0, DOI [10.4018/978-1-59140-342-5.ch003, DOI 10.4018/978-1-59140-342-5.CH003]

[9] An assessment study on various clean hydrogen production methods [J].

Aydin, Muhammed Iberia ;

Dincer, Ibrahim .

ENERGY, 2022, 245

[10] Development of Oshawa hydrogen hub in Canada: A case study [J].

Aydin, Muhammed Iberia ;

Dincer, Ibrahim ;

Ha, Harry .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (47) :23997-24010

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →