Academic Self-Efficacy and Performance of Underrepresented STEM Majors: Gender, Ethnic, and Social Class Patterns

被引:175
作者
MacPhee, David [1 ]
Farro, Samantha [2 ]
Canetto, Silvia Sara [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Human Dev & Family Studies, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
ENGINEERING MAJORS; CAREER INTERESTS; SCIENCE; WOMEN; MATHEMATICS; STUDENTS; ASPIRATIONS; MINORITIES; PREDICTORS; ATTRITION;
D O I
10.1111/asap.12033
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
This longitudinal study examined academic self-efficacy and performance among Science/Technology/Engineering/Math (STEM) majors who are underrepresented in STEM education and occupations; i.e., women, specific ethnic minorities, and low-socioeconomic status (SES) individuals. Performance on academic tests and self-perceptions of academic skills were assessed at admission and graduation from a STEM mentoring program. At admission, women perceived themselves as academically weaker than men despite similar academic performance. However, by graduation, women's academic self-efficacy was equivalent to men's. In addition, students with double STEM-minority statuses, by ethnicity and SES, had lower academic self-efficacy and performance than d id students with single STEM-minority status. Exploratory analyses of change over time by ethnic/SES groups showed varying patterns of change that depended on the outcome variable. This study's finding of an increase in academic self-efficacy for women and students with STEM-minority status by both ethnicity and SES at graduation from a mentoring program is perhaps an indication of the positive impact of mentoring. The mixed findings at program completion for students with single versus double STEM-minority status call for attention to the complex relationship between social disadvantage, academic self-efficacy, and academic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 369
页数:23
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, WOMEN SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WHY SO FEW WOMEN SCI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, WATSON GLASER CRITIC
[4]  
Babco E.L., 2004, PROFESSIONAL WOMEN M, V15th
[5]   Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories [J].
Bandura, A ;
Barbaranelli, C ;
Caprara, GV ;
Pastorelli, C .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 72 (01) :187-206
[6]  
Bandura A, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
[7]  
Barton A.C., 2006, The Sage handbook of gender and education, P211, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781848607996.N17
[8]  
Bernstein B.L., 2008, The psychology of women at work: Challenges and solutions for our female workforce, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.5860/CH0ICE.46-3941
[9]  
Betz N., 1997, MINORITIES GIRLS SCH, P105
[10]   Reflected appraisals, academic self-perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence [J].
Bouchey, HA ;
Harter, S .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 97 (04) :673-686