Penetration of inferior alveolar nerve canal increased by bicortical fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in mandibular prognathism

被引:3
|
作者
Sinha, S. P. [1 ,2 ]
Duong, T. D. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Duy, T-D T. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Ko, E. W-C [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Chen, Y-R [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Huang, C. S. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Craniofacial Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Craniofacial Orthodont, 199 Tung Hwa North Rd, Taipei 105, Taiwan
[3] Natl Childrens Hosp, Dept Maxillofacial Surg & Odontostomatol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Ho Chi Minh City Dent Hosp, Dept Orthodont, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[5] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Dent & Craniofacial Sci, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Linkou, Taiwan
关键词
jaw fixation techniques; mandibular nerve injuries; sagittal split ramus osteotomy; prognathism; Angle class III; NEUROSENSORY DISTURBANCE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; RAMUS OSTEOTOMY; INTERNAL-FIXATION; STABILITY; SCREW; COMPLICATIONS; RESTORATION; MINIPLATE; SETBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2021.04.011
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study was to identify the difference between monocortical fixation (MCF) and bicortical fixation (BCF) in mandibular canal penetration after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) to correct mandibular prognathism, where interosseous fixation was done by BCF or MCF. CBCT was performed 1 week postoperatively and Dolphin 3D software was used to assess direct penetration of the mandibular canal by either type of screw. The primary outcome variable was the presence or absence of mandibular canal penetration and was categorized as a binary coded variable. The BCF and MCF groups were compared by x(2) test, and the odds ratio for canal penetration was estimated. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors related to canal penetration. A total of 118 patients were included. The MCF group had only 6% canal penetrations (3/50 patients) and the BCF group had 58.8% canal penetrations (40/68 patients). The regression model showed that BCF was the only factor causing mandibular canal penetration, with an adjusted odds ratio of 52.5. Awareness of the increased risk of canal penetration with BCF and potential nerve injury might influence case selection.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 205
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is the magnitude of mandibular movement a risk factor for inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy?
    Shaltout, Salah El-Dein G.
    Shahine, Mohammed S.
    Saber, Diaa El-Dein
    Osman, Mohammed H.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 39 (04) : 849 - 855
  • [2] Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in monkeys: A comparison of monocortical and bicortical fixation
    Hu, J.
    Zhao, Q.
    Tang, J.
    Zheng, Z.
    Qi, M. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 45 (04) : 265 - 271
  • [3] Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism
    Paeng, Jun-Young
    Hong, Jongrak
    Kim, Chang-Soo
    Kim, Myung-Jin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 40 (08) : 660 - 664
  • [4] Relationship Between Inferior Alveolar Nerve Canal Position at Mandibular Second Molar in Patients With Prognathism and Possible Occurrence of Neurosensory Disturbance After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Yoshioka, Izumi
    Tanaka, Tatsurou
    Khanal, Amit
    Habu, Manabu
    Kito, Shinji
    Kodama, Masaaki
    Oda, Masafumi
    Wakasugi-Sato, Nao
    Matsumoto-Takeda, Shinobu
    Fukai, Yasuhiro
    Tokitsu, Takatoshi
    Tomikawa, Megumi
    Seta, Yuji
    Tominaga, Kazuhiro
    Morimoto, Yasuhiro
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (12) : 3022 - 3027
  • [5] Extraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy with rigid fixation for correction of mandibular prognathism. Comparison with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and surgical technique
    Hagensli, Niels
    Stenvik, Arild
    Espeland, Lisen
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (03) : 212 - 218
  • [6] Effect of modified bilateral sagittal split osteotomy on inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbance
    Schlund, Matthias
    Grall, Patrick
    Ferri, Joel
    Nicot, Romain
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 60 (08) : 1086 - 1091
  • [7] Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve imaging and neurosensory impairment following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in skeletal class III cases with mandibular prognathism
    Aizenbud, D.
    Ciceu, C.
    Hazan-Molina, H.
    Abu-El-Naaj, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (04) : 461 - 468
  • [8] Radiological evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve displacement after removal of impacted mandibular third molars prior to sagittal split osteotomy
    Bagourd, Thomas
    Varazzani, Andrea
    Dugast, Sophie
    Guyonvarc'h, Pierre
    Corre, Pierre
    Bertin, Helios
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (06)
  • [9] Intraoperative monitoring of the inferior alveolar nerve during mandibular sagittal-split osteotomy
    Jääskeläinen, SK
    Teerijoki-Oksa, T
    Forssell, K
    Vähätalo, K
    Peltola, JK
    Forssell, H
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2000, 23 (03) : 368 - 375
  • [10] Do positional changes of the inferior alveolar canal after sagittal split mandibular osteotomy affect neurosensory recovery?
    Doganay, O.
    Houle, A.
    Han, M. D.
    Miloro, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (11) : 1421 - 1429