Predictive Immune Markers for Disease Progression in Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

被引:0
|
作者
Isgor, Irem Sahver [1 ]
Toptas, Tayfur [2 ]
Turkoz, Huseyin Kemal [3 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Pendik Res & Training Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Hematol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Marmara Univ, Pendik Res & Training Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Multiple myeloma; Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; DKK-1; Pan-Ras; CCL-3; MUM-1; INTERNATIONAL STAGING SYSTEM; RAS MUTATIONS; BONE-DISEASE; PATHOGENESIS; MIP-1-ALPHA; CD138; CLASSIFICATION; GROWTH; MGUS;
D O I
10.4274/tjh.galenos.2022.2022.0046
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), the precursor of MM, are plasma cell neoplasms. The evolution of the treatment of MM in recent years has dramatically improved the outcome for these patients. Currently, multidisciplinary studies are being conducted to elucidate the etiopathogenesis of the disease and develop specific treatment agents and prognostic markers. The present study investigates the relationships between immunoexpression of CD138, Pan-Ras, CCL-3, DKK-1, and MUM-1 and disease progression in cases of MM and MGUS. Materials and Methods: Immunohistochemical staining for CD138, Pan-Ras, CCL-3, DKK-1, and MUM-1 were performed on bone marrow biopsy samples from 94 MM and 20 MGUS patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2018. Immunohistochemical results were examined semiquantitatively, and the associations between the immunohistochemical, clinical, and biochemical markers utilized for MM and MGUS patient staging were analyzed. Results: Pan-Ras, DKK-1, and MUM-1 staining results were significantly higher in MM compared to MGUS (p=0.005, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). The mean CCL-3 expression in patients with MGUS was 23.15%, while it was 18.68% in cases of MM (p=0.413). CCL-3 expression was significantly higher in high-risk MGUS cases compared to other risk groups according to the Mayo Clinic Risk Stratification for MGUS. According to the International Staging System and the Revised International Staging System, CD138 expression was higher among stage II and stage III patients than stage I patients. Conclusion: Differences in Pan-Ras, MUM-1, DKK-1, and CCL-3 expressions between MM and MGUS suggest that these molecules may play a role in the progression of MGUS to MM. CCL-3, an immunohistochemical marker, may be predictive of MGUS progression, while CD138 is associated with more advanced stages of MM.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 253
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Autoimmune disease is associated with a lower risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Baldursdottir, Theodora Run
    Love, Thorvardur Jon
    Gislason, Gauti Kjartan
    Bjorkholm, Magnus
    Mellqvist, Ulf-Henrik
    Lund, Sigrun Helga
    Blimark, Cecilie Hveding
    Turesson, Ingemar
    Hultcrantz, Malin
    Landgren, Ola
    Kristinsson, Sigurdur Yngvi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2021, 106 (03) : 380 - 388
  • [32] Pathogenesis and progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    J Bladé
    L Rosiñol
    M T Cibeira
    C F de Larrea
    Leukemia, 2008, 22 : 1651 - 1657
  • [33] Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in atomic bomb survivors: incidence and transformation to multiple myeloma
    Neriishi, K
    Nakashima, E
    Suzuki, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2003, 121 (03) : 405 - 410
  • [34] Distinct Nuclear Organization of Telomeres and Centromeres in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Multiple Myeloma
    Yu, Pak Lok Ivan
    Wang, Rachel R.
    Johnston, Grace
    Wang, Yaqiong
    Tammur, Pille
    Tamm, Anu
    Punab, Mari
    Rangel-Pozzo, Aline
    Mai, Sabine
    CELLS, 2019, 8 (07)
  • [35] Diagnosis, risk stratification and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma
    van de Donk, N. W. C. J.
    Mutis, T.
    Poddighe, P. J.
    Lokhorst, H. M.
    Zweegman, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2016, 38 : 110 - 122
  • [36] Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Zandecki, M
    Geneviève, F
    Jego, P
    Grosbois, B
    REVUE DE MEDECINE INTERNE, 2000, 21 (12): : 1060 - 1074
  • [37] Differing coagulation profiles of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma
    Crowely, Maeve P.
    Quinn, Shane
    Coleman, Eoin
    Eustace, Joseph A.
    Gilligan, Oonagh M.
    Shea, Susan I. O.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2015, 39 (02) : 245 - 249
  • [38] PERIPHERAL-BLOOD LYMPHOCYTE SUBSETS IN MULTIPLE-MYELOMA AND MONOCLONAL GAMMOPATHY OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE
    TIENHAARA, A
    PELLINIEMI, TT
    CLINICAL AND LABORATORY HAEMATOLOGY, 1994, 16 (03): : 213 - 223
  • [39] Platelet hyperactivation in multiple myeloma is also evident in patients with premalignant monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    O'Sullivan, Leanne R.
    Meade-Murphy, Gerardene
    Gilligan, Oonagh M.
    Mykytiv, Vitaliy
    Young, Paul W.
    Cahill, Mary R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2021, 192 (02) : 322 - 332
  • [40] Evaluation of Genes and Molecular Pathways Involved in the Progression of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) to Multiple Myeloma: A Systems Biology Approach
    Parisa Khalili
    Reza Maddah
    Mohsen Maleknia
    Bahareh Shateri Amiri
    Fatemeh Forouzani
    Afshin Hasanvand
    Hadi Rezaeeyan
    Molecular Biotechnology, 2023, 65 : 1275 - 1286