Low-income energy efficiency programs and energy consumption

被引:12
作者
Hancevic, Pedro, I [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sandoval, Hector H. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Res & Teaching Econ CIDE, Dept Econ, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Panamer Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
[3] Red Nacl Invest Econ RedNIE Argentina, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Econ, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[5] Univ Florida, Bur Econ & Business Res BEBR, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Energy efficiency; Electricity consumption; Low-income program; Heterogeneous effects; Social marginal costs; INVESTMENTS DELIVER; SAVINGS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102656
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Low-income energy efficiency programs have become a major component of cities' energy policy, with 49 out of 51 largest metropolitan areas in the U.S. offering one. This paper uses data from Gainesville Regional Utility to quantify the impacts of the housing investment done by its Low-income Energy Efficiency Program Plus (LEEP Plus) on energy consumption. Our results show that LEEP Plus does not affect natural gas consumption but reduces electricity consumption by approximately 7%, with greater savings occurring in the summer and winter. The effect on electricity consumption is significant to a variety of robustness checks and remains for at least 24 months after the completion of energy efficiency upgrades. We also measure some relevant heterogeneous effects, one of which is the breakdown of the air-conditioning-related investments, the main energy efficiency improvement under the LEEP Plus program. Finally, we evaluate the energy savings in monetary terms considering the private cost changes and the social cost changes. In both cases, the associated energy savings are not enough to offset the investment costs.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap?
    Allcott, Hunt
    Greenstone, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 26 (01) : 3 - 28
  • [2] Energy efficiency and household behavior: the rebound effect in the residential sector
    Aydin, Erdal
    Kok, Nils
    Brounen, Dirk
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2017, 48 (03) : 749 - 782
  • [3] The future of utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs in the USA: projected spending and savings to 2025
    Barbose, Galen L.
    Goldman, Charles A.
    Hoffman, Ian M.
    Billingsley, Megan
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2013, 6 (03) : 475 - 493
  • [4] Defining the rebound effect
    Berkhout, PHG
    Muskens, JC
    Velthuijsen, JW
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) : 425 - 432
  • [5] Blonz J., 2019, FINANCE EC DISCUSSIO, V2019071
  • [6] Evaluating the Energy-Saving Effects of a Utility Demand-Side Management Program: A Difference-in-Difference Coarsened Exact Matching Approach
    Boampong, Richard
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (04) : 185 - 207
  • [7] Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver at the Right Time?
    Boomhower, Judson
    Davis, Lucas
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 12 (01) : 115 - 139
  • [8] A credible approach for measuring inframarginal participation in energy efficiency programs
    Boomhower, Judson
    Davis, Lucas W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2014, 113 : 67 - 79
  • [9] Machine Learning from Schools about Energy Efficiency
    Burlig, Fiona
    Knittel, Christopher
    Rapson, David
    Reguant, Mar
    Wolfram, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2020, 7 (06) : 1181 - 1217
  • [10] Strategic Policy Choice in State-Level Regulation: The EPA's Clean Power Plan
    Bushnell, James B.
    Holland, Stephen P.
    Hughes, Jonathan E.
    Knittel, Christopher R.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2017, 9 (02) : 57 - 90