A Multisession Evaluation of a Collaborative Virtual Environment for Arm Rehabilitation

被引:8
作者
Gorsic, Maja [1 ]
Cikajlo, Imre [2 ,3 ]
Goljar, Nika [2 ]
Novak, Domen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Univ Rehabil Inst, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Nova Gorica, Sch Engn & Management, SI-5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia
来源
PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY | 2018年 / 27卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; PATIENT ENGAGEMENT; REALITY; NORMS;
D O I
10.1162/pres_a_00331
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In recent years, several multi-user virtual environments (VEs) have been developed to promote motivation and exercise intensity in motor rehabilitation. While competitive VEs have been extensively evaluated, collaborative and competitive rehabilitation VEs have seen relatively little study. Therefore, this article presents an evaluation of a VE for post-stroke arm rehabilitation that mimics everyday kitchen tasks and can be used either solo or collaboratively. Twenty subacute stroke survivors exercised with the VE for four sessions, with the first and third sessions involving solo exercise and the other two involving collaborative exercise. Exercise intensity was measured using inertial sensors while motivation was measured with questionnaires. Results showed high motivation and exercise intensity over all four sessions, and 11 of 20 participants preferred collaborative over solo exercise while only 4 preferred solo exercise. However, there were no differences in motivation, exercise duration, or exercise intensity between solo and collaborative sessions. Thus, we cannot currently claim that collaborative exercises are beneficial for upper limb rehabilitation. Future studies should evaluate other collaborative VE designs in different settings (e.g., at home) and with different participant pairs (e.g., patient-unimpaired) to find effective ways to utilize collaborative exercises in motor rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 286
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Baur K., 2018, P 2018 IEEE RSJ INT, DOI [10.1109/IROS.2018.8593769, DOI 10.1109/IROS.2018.8593769]
[2]   RECOVERY OF MOTOR FUNCTION AFTER STROKE [J].
BONITA, R ;
BEAGLEHOLE, R .
STROKE, 1988, 19 (12) :1497-1500
[3]   Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation [J].
Colombo, Roberto ;
Pisano, Fabrizio ;
Mazzone, Alessandra ;
Delconte, Carmen ;
Micera, Silvestro ;
Carrozza, M. Chiara ;
Dario, Paolo ;
Minuco, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2007, 4 (1)
[4]   POPULATION-BASED NORMS FOR THE MINI-MENTAL-STATE-EXAMINATION BY AGE AND EDUCATIONAL-LEVEL [J].
CRUM, RM ;
ANTHONY, JC ;
BASSETT, SS ;
FOLSTEIN, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (18) :2386-2391
[5]  
Csikszentmihalyi M.R., 1990, Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, DOI DOI 10.1080/00222216.1992.11969876
[6]   Feasibility of incorporating functionally relevant virtual rehabilitation in sub-acute stroke care: perception of patients and clinicians [J].
Demers, Marika ;
Kong, Daniel Chan Chun ;
Levin, Mindy F. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 (04) :361-367
[7]  
Go AS, 2013, CIRCULATION, V127, P143, DOI [10.1161/CIR.0b013e318282ab8f, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366]
[8]  
Gori M, 2017, J NEUROENG REHABIL, V14, P23, DOI DOI 10.1186/s12984-017-0231-4
[9]  
Gorsic M, 2018, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P3602, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513005
[10]   A multisession evaluation of an adaptive competitive arm rehabilitation game [J].
Gorsic, Maja ;
Cikajlo, Imre ;
Goljar, Nika ;
Novak, Domen .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 14