Analysis of the impact of proximity correction algorithms on circuit performance

被引:17
作者
Chen, L [1 ]
Milor, LS
Ouyang, CH
Maly, W
Peng, YK
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Adv Micro Devices Inc, Sunnyvale, CA 94088 USA
关键词
mask correction; optical proximity correction (OPC); proximity effect; speed maximization;
D O I
10.1109/66.778196
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Variation in channel length degrades circuit reliability and yield. A common way to compensate for this problem is to increase the mean channel length, which, unfortunately, degrades circuit performance for digital circuits. One source of channel length variation is lithography, during which the line width is influenced by local layout patterns. It is possible to compensate for this effect by resizing transistor gates appropriately on the mask. However, the effectiveness of the correction is limited by constraints such as the mask correction resolution. To determine how to design a good correction scheme with limited resources, we have developed a method to compare different correction algorithms in terms of their impact on the performance of one of the main functional blocks in a state-of-the-art microprocessor, In particular, to evaluate correction algorithms while avoiding the high cost associated with generating multiple mask sets and fabricating product wafers with each of these mask sets, we present a method for predicting the correction results using simulation. Our methodology involves a DRC-based approach for gate resizing, along with critical path simulation for evaluating circuit performance. In-line CD measurement data were used to measure the impact of the proximity effect on transistor channel length. Electrical test results were used to calibrate the device models for circuit simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 322
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Born M., 1986, PRINCIPLES OPTICS
[2]  
*CAD DES SYST INC, 1987, B97E060 CAD DES SYST
[3]  
*CAD DES SYST INC, 1992, CAD OP INT DES ENV R
[4]  
CHEN JF, PRACTICAL METHOD FUL
[5]   Proximity effect correction for clock rate maximization [J].
Chen, L ;
Milor, L ;
Ouyang, C ;
Maly, W ;
Peng, Y .
MICROELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING YIELD, RELIABILITY, AND FAILURE ANALYSIS IV, 1998, 3510 :82-93
[6]   MASK ASSISTED OFF-AXIS ILLUMINATION TECHNIQUE FOR RANDOM LOGIC [J].
GAROFALO, J ;
BIDDICK, CJ ;
KOSTELAK, RL ;
VAIDYA, S .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 1993, 11 (06) :2651-2656
[7]   Influence of resist process on proximity bias [J].
GehoelvanAnsem, WFJ ;
Zandbergen, P ;
Juffermans, CAH .
MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 1997, 35 (1-4) :193-196
[8]  
HENDERSON RC, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2197, P361
[9]   Simple method of correcting optical proximity effect for 0.35 mu m logic LSI circuits [J].
Kawamura, E ;
Haruki, T ;
Manabe, Y ;
Hanyu, I .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS PART 1-REGULAR PAPERS SHORT NOTES & REVIEW PAPERS, 1995, 34 (12B) :6547-6551
[10]  
LI X, 1997, P SISPAD SEP, P339