Framework for the inter-comparison of ecological footprint of universities

被引:15
|
作者
Nunes, L. M. [1 ]
Catarino, A. [2 ]
Ribau Teixeira, M. [2 ,3 ]
Cuesta, E. M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Algarve, Geosyst Ctr, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal
[2] Univ Algarve, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal
[3] CENSE, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal
[4] Univ Huelva, Fac Ciencias Expt, Huelva 21071, Spain
关键词
Ecological footprint; Uncertainty; Monte Carlo simulations; Inter-comparability; University; PROBABILISTIC RISK-ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY; PROPAGATION; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.04.007
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The ecological footprint (EF) method represents the suitability of a given population on the carrying capacity of the total system. It was developed in order to measure the relationship between nature and humans, being supported on the premise that each individual requires a surface area that provides goods and services essential to life. In this article only in EF for universities is studied, but most of the underlying concepts and methods are valid for any other human activity for which EF may be applied. In this study an uncertainty analysis of EF of universities is made. This is, to the authors' knowledge, the first time such a study is published on the subject. The intention is to demonstrate the usefulness of uncertainty analysis in the evaluation of results, inter-comparability, and on communication of EF outcomes. Results showed that EF model uncertainties have large impact on EF estimates, in particular in what regards the decision about accounting or not the contribution of key parameters. Inclusion or not of very sensitive parameters, for which there is also high uncertainty, in the estimation of EF may have a strong impact on the estimated values and also in the inter-comparability of EF estimates. This is the case of mobility. Uncertainty analysis, by studying model uncertainty, parameter uncertainty and variability, can provide a robust framework for the inter-comparison of ecological footprints of universities. In fact, the method may prove useful for the assessment of ecological footprints of any kind. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The ecological footprint at the Universities
    Tornero Gomez, Tomas
    GUINIGUADA, 2021, 30 : 135 - 153
  • [2] An Inter-Comparison of Passive Dosemeters for Terrestrial Gamma Radiation Measurements
    Ding, Yanqiu
    Wang, Kaiyi
    Gao, Pin
    Hu, Aiying
    Guo, Wen
    Han, Yanqing
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2022, 198 (16) : 1205 - 1209
  • [3] Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis
    Hoekstra, A. Y.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (07) : 1963 - 1974
  • [4] Simulation of maize evapotranspiration: An inter-comparison among 29 maize models
    Kimball, Bruce A.
    Boote, Kenneth J.
    Hatfield, Jerry L.
    Ahuja, Laj R.
    Stockle, Claudio
    Archontoulis, Sotirios
    Baron, Christian
    Basso, Bruno
    Bertuzzi, Patrick
    Constantin, Julie
    Deryng, Delphine
    Dumont, Benjamin
    Durand, Jean-Louis
    Ewert, Frank
    Gaiser, Thomas
    Gayler, Sebastian
    Hoffmann, Munir P.
    Jiang, Qianjing
    Kim, Soo-Hyung
    Lizaso, Jon
    Moulin, Sophie
    Nendel, Claas
    Parker, Philip
    Palosuo, Taru
    Priesack, Eckart
    Qi, Zhiming
    Srivastava, Amit
    Stella, Tommaso
    Tao, Fulu
    Thorp, Kelly R.
    Timlin, Dennis
    Twine, Tracy E.
    Webber, Heidi
    Willaume, Magali
    Williams, Karina
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2019, 271 : 264 - 284
  • [5] An improved vertical correction method for the inter-comparison and inter-validation of integrated water vapour measurements
    Bock, Olivier
    Bosser, Pierre
    Mears, Carl
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2022, 15 (19) : 5643 - 5665
  • [6] Simulation of evapotranspiration and yield of maize: An Inter-comparison among 41 maize models
    Kimball, Bruce A.
    Thorp, Kelly R.
    Boote, Kenneth J.
    Stockle, Claudio
    Suyker, Andrew E.
    Evett, Steven R.
    Brauer, David K.
    Coyle, Gwen G.
    Copeland, Karen S.
    Marek, Gary W.
    Colaizzi, Paul D.
    Acutis, Marco
    Alimagham, Seyyedmajid
    Archontoulis, Sotirios
    Babacar, Faye
    Barcza, Zoltan
    Basso, Bruno
    Bertuzzi, Patrick
    Constantin, Julie
    Migliorati, Massimiliano De Antoni
    Dumont, Benjamin
    Durand, Jean-Louis
    Fodor, Nandor
    Gaiser, Thomas
    Garofalo, Pasquale
    Gayler, Sebastian
    Giglio, Luisa
    Grant, Robert
    Guan, Kaiyu
    Hoogenboom, Gerrit
    Jiang, Qianjing
    Kim, Soo-Hyung
    Kisekka, Isaya
    Lizaso, Jon
    Masia, Sara
    Meng, Huimin
    Mereu, Valentina
    Mukhtar, Ahmed
    Perego, Alessia
    Peng, Bin
    Priesack, Eckart
    Qi, Zhiming
    Shelia, Vakhtang
    Snyder, Richard
    Soltani, Afshin
    Spano, Donatella
    Srivastava, Amit
    Thomson, Aimee
    Timlin, Dennis
    Trabucco, Antonio
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2023, 333
  • [7] Inter-comparison of statistical downscaling methods for projection of extreme flow indices across Europe
    Hundecha, Yeshewatesfa
    Sunyer, Maria A.
    Lawrence, Deborah
    Madsen, Henrik
    Willems, Patrick
    Burger, Gerd
    Kriauciuniene, Jurate
    Loukas, Athanasios
    Martinkova, Marta
    Osuch, Marzena
    Vasiliades, Lampros
    von Christierson, Birgitte
    Vormoor, Klaus
    Yucel, Ismail
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 541 : 1273 - 1286
  • [8] Refining the ecological footprint
    Venetoulis J.
    Talberth J.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2008, 10 (4) : 441 - 469
  • [9] Ecological Footprint, environmental performance and biodiversity: A cross-national comparison
    Vackar, David
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 16 : 40 - 46
  • [10] Ecological Footprint: Refining the carbon Footprint calculation
    Mancini, Maria Serena
    Galli, Alessandro
    Niccolucci, Valentina
    Lin, David
    Bastianoni, Simone
    Wackernagel, Mathis
    Marchettini, Nadia
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 : 390 - 403