Differences in Alcohol and Other Drug Use and Dependence Between Transgender and Cisgender Participants from the 2018 Global Drug Survey

被引:16
作者
Connolly, Dean J. [1 ,2 ,11 ]
Davies, Emma [3 ]
Lynskey, Michael [1 ]
Maier, Larissa J. [4 ,5 ]
Ferris, Jason A. [6 ]
Barratt, Monica J. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Winstock, Adam R. [10 ]
Gilchrist, Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Natl Addict Ctr, London, England
[2] East London NHS Fdn Trust, Newham Ctr Mental Hlth, Early Intervent Serv, London, England
[3] Oxford Brookes Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Dept Psychol, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Clin Pharm, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Swiss Natl Sci Fdn, Early Postdoc Mobil Grantee P2ZHP1 174812, Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Brisbane, Australia
[7] RMIT Univ, Social & Global Studies Ctr, Melbourne, Australia
[8] RMIT Univ, Digital Ethnog Res Ctr, Melbourne, Australia
[9] UNSW Sydney, Natl Drug & Alcohol Res Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[10] UCL, Inst Epidemiol & Hlth Care, London, England
[11] Kings Coll London, Natl Addict Ctr, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, 4 Windsor Walk, London SE5 8AF, England
关键词
alcohol; drugs; substance dependence; substance use disorder; substance use; transgender; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE TREATMENT; SCALE SDS; HEALTH-CARE; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; DIAGNOSTIC CUTOFF; RISK BEHAVIORS; MENTAL-HEALTH; HIV RISK; SEVERITY; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1089/lgbt.2021.0242
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare five gender groups (cisgender women, cisgender men, transgender women, transgender men, people with nonbinary/other identities) on measures of use of and dependence on seven substances.Methods: A two-stage approach to assessing gender allowed 126,648 participants from the 2018 Global Drug Survey (GDS) to be classified to one of these five gender groups. Participants were asked to disclose use of each substance in the preceding 12 months. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and the Severity of Dependence Scale were used to assess dependence. Multivariable logistic regression generated odds ratios (ORs) to measure the association between gender and each substance use/dependence outcome, with cisgender women as the reference group.Results: The sample comprised 43,331 cisgender women, 81,607 cisgender men, 215 transgender women, 254 transgender men, and 1241 people with nonbinary/other identities. Relative to cisgender women, nonbinary/other participants reported greater odds of last 12-month use of all substances (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.66-2.93), except alcohol (lower odds; AOR = 0.42), and greater odds of dependence on cannabis (AOR = 2.39), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (AOR = 1.64) and alcohol (AOR = 3.28), adjusting only for age (all p < 0.05).Conclusion: Transgender 2018 GDS respondents, particularly those with nonbinary/other identities, had greater odds of reporting most substance use outcomes than cisgender women. These findings suggest that a nuanced approach to gender reporting in surveys and treatment centers is required to understand the needs of transgender people who use substances.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 542
页数:9
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Allen JP, 1997, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES, V21, P613, DOI 10.1097/00000374-199706000-00008
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, SPSS 27 COMP PROGR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, SPSS 25 COMP PROGR
[4]  
Appleby L., 2016, MENTAL HLTH WELLBEIN
[5]   Examining the Effects of Transphobic Discrimination and Race on HIV Risk Among Transwomen in San Francisco [J].
Arayasirikul, Sean ;
Wilson, Erin C. ;
Raymond, Henry F. .
AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 21 (09) :2628-2633
[6]  
Babor T. F., 2001, AUDIT ALCOHOL USE DI
[7]  
Balarajan M., 2011, 75 EQ HUM RIGHTS COM
[8]  
Barratt MJ, 2017, SUBST ABUS-RES TREAT, V11, DOI 10.1177/1178221817716391
[9]   Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations [J].
Bauer, Greta R. ;
Braimoh, Jessica ;
Scheim, Ayden I. ;
Dharma, Christoffer .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05)
[10]  
Bockting W.O., 1999, SIECUS REPORT, V28, P3