Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Inpatients with and without Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review

被引:73
作者
Redston, Mitchell R. [1 ,2 ]
Hilmer, Sarah N. [2 ,3 ]
McLachlan, Andrew J. [1 ,4 ]
Clough, Alexander J. [1 ,2 ]
Gnjidic, Danijela [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Pharm, Pharm & Bank Bldg A15, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Royal North Shore Hosp, Kolling Inst Med Res, Dept Aged Care & Clin Pharmacol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Ctr Educ & Res Ageing, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cognitive impairment; dementia; hospitalization; older people; polypharmacy; potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs); prevalence; ELDERLY HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; PERSONS PRESCRIPTIONS STOPP; CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS; ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS; SCREENING TOOL; DEMENTIA; POLYPHARMACY; CARE; PEOPLE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.3233/JAD-170842
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Older people with cognitive impairment, including dementia and delirium, are high users of acute care services internationally. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use may be associated with adverse outcomes, including hospital re-admission, functional disability, and mortality. Objective: This systematic review aimed to quantify and compare the prevalence of PIMs in older inpatients with and without cognitive impairment. Methods: A systematic search of observational studies was performed independently assessed by two reviewers in Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Scopus, and Informit. Articles published in English during the period January 2007-June 2017 that reported PIM prevalence in hospital inpatients >= 65 years were included. PIMs were defined as the presence of polypharmacy (multiple medication use) and using implicit or explicit tools, such as the Beers criteria, and 'Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions' (STOPP). Results: 47 articles were included. In studies measuring polypharmacy (n = 15), the prevalence of PIMs ranged from 53.2% to 89.8% and 30.4% to 97.1% for inpatients with and without cognitive impairment, respectively, and 24.0% to 80.0% when cognitive status was unreported. In studies employing explicit and implicit tools (n = 35), the prevalence of PIMs when cognitive impairment was reported ranged from 20.6% to 80.5% using the Beers criteria, and 39.3% to 88.5% using STOPP. When cognitive status was unreported, the prevalence of PIMs ranged from 7.0% to 79.2% using the Beers criteria, and 20.0% to 63.4% using STOPP. Conclusion: Our findings suggest a high prevalence of PIMs in older inpatients with and without cognitive impairment. Future studies should investigate the impact of PIM use on patient-centered outcomes, such as functional status and quality of life, to inform enhanced acute care services.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1652
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Inappropriate prescribing in hospitalised Australian elderly as determined by the STOPP criteria [J].
Abd Wahab, Mohd Shahezwan ;
Nyfort-Hansen, Karin ;
Kowalski, Stefan R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2012, 34 (06) :855-862
[2]  
[Anonymous], J AM MED DIR ASS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INDONESIA INT J PHAR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PHARMANEST
[5]  
[Anonymous], Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews
[6]  
[Anonymous], J GLOBAL TRENDS PHAR
[7]  
[Anonymous], DEM CAR AC HOSP SETT
[8]   Using two tools to identify Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM) in elderly patients in Southern Chile [J].
Arellano, Camila ;
Saldivia, Gabriela ;
Cordova, Pia ;
Fernandez, Pola ;
Morales, Felipe ;
Lopez, Mariela ;
Villa, Lorenzo .
ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2016, 67 :139-144
[9]   Investigating polypharmacy and drug burden index in hospitalised older people [J].
Best, O. ;
Gnjidic, D. ;
Hilmer, S. N. ;
Naganathan, V. ;
McLachlan, A. J. .
INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 43 (08) :912-918
[10]  
Borah L., 2017, ASIAN J PHARM CLIN R, V10, P122, DOI [10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i2.14762, DOI 10.22159/AJPCR.2017.V10I2.14762]