Identification of Self-Incompatibility Genotypes in Iranian Almond Cultivars

被引:0
作者
Mousavi, A. [1 ]
Fatahi, R. [1 ]
Zamani, Z. [1 ]
Imani, A. [2 ]
Dicenta, F. [3 ]
Ortega, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Fac Agr, Dept Hort Sci, Karaj 31587, Iran
[2] SPII, Horticultural Res Dept, Karaj, Iran
[3] CEBAS CSIC, Dept Plant Breeding, Murcia, Spain
来源
V INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PISTACHIOS AND ALMONDS | 2011年 / 912卷
关键词
Prunus dulcis; S-RNase alleles; PCR; consensus primers; PRUNUS-DULCIS; S-ALLELES; STYLAR RIBONUCLEASES; PCR DETECTION; PRIMERS; SEQUENCES; PROGENIES; CONSENSUS; CLONING;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Almond is an economically important fruit tree species in which the commercial part is the seed, making fertilization essential for production. Due to its general self-incompatibility (a genetic barrier that avoids self-fertilization), two or more cross-compatible cultivars must be grown in the same orchard. Thus, determination of the self-incompatibility genotype is a very useful tool for orchard design and for parental choice in breeding programs. The S-RNase alleles of 62 almond cultivars grown in Iran were identified by PCR, using combinations of the consensus primers PaConsI-F, EM-PC1consRD, EM-PC2consFD, EM-PC3consRD, and EM-PC5consRD. Sixteen cultivars of European, American, and Asian origin were also included in the analysis as references for the 30 S-RNase alleles already characterized in almond. Initially, PCR products obtained with the primer set EM-PC2consFD +EM-PC3consRD were run on agarose gels alongside the reference cultivars. When inconsistencies such as amplification of only one band or unclear band size correspondence were found, PCR using the primer sets PaConsI-F +EM-PC1consRD or PaConsI-F + EM-PC5consRD was performed. In most cases, the results showed two bands that matched the size of known S-RNase alleles. However, in 13 cultivars eight bands differing in size from those of the reference cultivars were identified. These bands were considered to correspond to new S-RNases. The S genotype of most cultivars differed from those of the established cross-incompatibility groups and, although the vast majority could be classified in the universal group O, some showed an identical genotype, so that nine new groups could be proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 311
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A stylar ribonuclease assay to detect self-compatible seedlings in almond progenies [J].
Boskovic, R ;
Tobutt, KR ;
Duval, H ;
Batlle, I ;
Dicenta, F ;
Vargas, FJ .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1999, 99 (05) :800-810
[2]   Correlation of ribonuclease zymograms and incompatibility genotypes in almond [J].
Boskovic, R ;
Tobutt, KR ;
Batlle, I ;
Duval, H .
EUPHYTICA, 1997, 97 (02) :167-176
[3]  
Boskovic R, 1998, ACTA HORTIC, P118
[4]   Stylar ribonucleases in almond: correlation with and prediction of incompatibility genotypes [J].
Boskovic, R ;
Tobutt, KR ;
Batlle, I ;
Duval, H ;
Martinez-Gomez, P ;
Gradziel, TM .
PLANT BREEDING, 2003, 122 (01) :70-76
[5]   Identification of incompatibility genotypes in almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) using specific primers based on the introns of the S-alleles [J].
Channuntapipat, C ;
Wirthensohn, M ;
Ramesh, SA ;
Batlle, I ;
Arús, P ;
Sedgley, M ;
Collins, G .
PLANT BREEDING, 2003, 122 (02) :164-168
[6]   Sequences of the genomic DNAs encoding the S2, S9, S10, and S23 alleles from almond, Prunus dulcis [J].
Channuntapipat, C ;
Sedgley, M ;
Batlle, I ;
Arús, P ;
Collins, G .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 77 (04) :387-392
[7]   Sequences of the cDNAs and genomic DNAs encoding the S1, S7, S8, and Sf alleles from almond, Prunus dulcis [J].
Channuntapipat, C ;
Sedgley, M ;
Collins, G .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2001, 103 (6-7) :1115-1122
[8]  
Crossa-Raynaud P, 1985, OPTIONS MEDITERR, V85, P43
[9]  
De Nettancourt D., 2001, Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants, P322
[10]   IDENTIFYING POLLEN INCOMPATIBILITY GROUPS IN CALIFORNIA ALMOND CULTIVARS [J].
KESTER, DE ;
GRADZIEL, TM ;
MICKE, WC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1994, 119 (01) :106-109