The effectiveness of inter-professional working for older people living in the community: a systematic review

被引:65
作者
Trivedi, Daksha [1 ]
Goodman, Claire [1 ]
Gage, Heather [2 ]
Baron, Natasha [1 ]
Scheibl, Fiona [1 ]
Iliffe, Steve [3 ]
Manthorpe, Jill [4 ]
Bunn, Frances [1 ]
Drennan, Vari [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Ctr Res Primary & Community Care CRIPACC, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Sch Econ, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
[3] UCL, Dept Primary Care & Populat Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Social Care Workforce Res Unit, London, England
[5] St Georges Univ London, Fac Hlth & Social Care Sci, London, England
[6] Univ Kingston, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
community dwelling; inter-professional working; interventions; older people; team work; OUTPATIENT GERIATRIC EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FRAIL ELDERLY-PEOPLE; FALL-PREVENTION PROGRAM; LATE-LIFE DEPRESSION; PRIMARY-CARE; CASE-MANAGEMENT; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HOME INTERVENTION; COORDINATED CARE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01067.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Health and social care policy in the UK advocates inter-professional working (IPW) to support older people with complex and multiple needs. Whilst there is a growing understanding of what supports IPW, there is a lack of evidence linking IPW to explicit outcomes for older people living in the community. This review aimed to identify the models of IPW that provide the strongest evidence base for practice with community dwelling older people. We searched electronic databases from 1 January 199031 March 2008. In December 2010 we updated the findings from relevant systematic reviews identified since 2008. We selected papers describing interventions that involved IPW for community dwelling older people and randomised controlled trials (RCT) reporting user-relevant outcomes. Included studies were classified by IPW models (Case Management, Collaboration and Integrated Team) and assessed for risk of bias. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the evidence according to the type of care (interventions delivering acute, chronic, palliative and preventive care) identified within each model of IPW. We retrieved 3211 records and included 37 RCTs which were mapped onto the IPW models: Overall, there is weak evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for IPW, although well-integrated and shared care models improved processes of care and have the potential to reduce hospital or nursing/care home use. Study quality varied considerably and high quality evaluations as well as observational studies are needed to identify the key components of effective IPW in relation to user-defined outcomes. Differences in local contexts raise questions about the applicability of the findings and their implications for practice. We need more information on the outcomes of the process of IPW and evaluations of the effectiveness of different configurations of health and social care professionals for the care of community dwelling older people.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 128
页数:16
相关论文
共 113 条
[41]   Coordinated care: what does that really mean? [J].
Ehrlich, Carolyn ;
Kendall, Elizabeth ;
Muenchberger, Heidi ;
Armstrong, Kylie .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2009, 17 (06) :619-627
[42]   Outcomes of coordinated and integrated interventions targeting frail elderly people: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J].
Eklund, Kajsa ;
Wilhelmson, Katarina .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2009, 17 (05) :447-458
[43]   The effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management [J].
Engelhardt, JB ;
Toseland, RW ;
ODonnell, JC ;
Richie, JT ;
Jue, D ;
Banks, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1996, 44 (07) :847-856
[44]   Kaiser Permanente Community Partners project: Improving geriatric care management practices [J].
Enguidanos, SM ;
Gibbs, NE ;
Simmons, WJ ;
Savoni, KJ ;
Jamison, PM ;
Hackstaff, L ;
Griffin, AM ;
Cherin, DA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2003, 51 (05) :710-714
[45]  
Enguidanos Susan M, 2006, Home Health Care Serv Q, V25, P13, DOI 10.1300/J027v25n01_02
[46]   CONSULTATIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT FOR AMBULATORY PATIENTS - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL IN A HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION [J].
EPSTEIN, AM ;
HALL, JA ;
FRETWELL, M ;
FELDSTEIN, M ;
DECIANTIS, ML ;
TOGNETTI, J ;
CUTLER, C ;
CONSTANTINE, M ;
BESDINE, R ;
ROWE, J ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (04) :538-544
[47]  
Fordyce M, 1997, J Am Board Fam Pract, V10, P398
[48]   Intermediate care at a community hospital as an alternative to prolonged general hospital care for elderly patients:: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Garasen, Helge ;
Windspoll, Rolf ;
Johnsen, Roar .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 7 (1)
[49]   Long-term patients' outcomes after intermediate care at a community hospital for elderly patients:: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial [J].
Garasen, Helge ;
Windspoll, Rolf ;
Johnsen, Roar .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 36 (02) :197-204
[50]  
Glasby J., 2008, Partnership Working in Health and Social Care (Better Partnership Working)