Systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis:: Estimating cost-effectiveness using dynamic modeling and Dutch data

被引:37
|
作者
de Vries, R
van Bergen, JEAM
de Jong-van den Berg, LTW
Postma, MJ
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, GUIDE, Dept Social Pharm Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacothe, GRIP,Res Inst Pharm, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] STI AIDS Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Chlamydia trachomatis; cost-effectiveness analysis; screening; transmission dynamics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00075.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a systematic one-off Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) screening program including partner treatment for Dutch young adults. Data on infection prevalence, participation rates, and sexual behavior were obtained from a large pilot study conducted in The Netherlands. Opposite to almost all previous economic evaluations of CT screening, we developed a dynamic Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) model to estimate the impact of the screening program on the incidence and prevalence of CT in the population. SIS models are widely used in epidemiology of infectious diseases, for modeling the transmission dynamics over time. Subsequently, a predictive decision model was used to calculate the complications averted by the screening program. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the net costs per major outcome averted (MOA) and was estimated in the baseline analysis and in sensitivity analysis. The overall prevalence decreased from 1.79% to 1.05% as a result of the screening program directed at both men and women. The program costs were mainly offset by the averted costs, although not fully. Resulting net costs per MOA were 373 in the baseline analysis. Sensitivity analysis showed that partner treatment and sending a reminder are important aspects improving cost-effectiveness. Additionally, restricting the screening to women only was estimated to save costs. Our cost-effectiveness analysis shows that the Dutch society has net to pay for the prevention of CT-complications through screening young men and women. One could argue although that 373 per MOA presents a reasonable cost. A screening program consisting of screening women only should always be adopted from a pharmacoeconomic point of view. Our dynamic approach appreciates better the specific characteristics of an infectious disease, such as CT.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring Structural Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Gestational Diabetes Screening: An Application Example from Norway
    Henkel, Pia S.
    Burger, Emily A.
    Sletner, Line
    Pedersen, Kine
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 44 (04) : 380 - 392
  • [42] Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Opportunistic Screening Using Computed Tomography in China
    Gao, Lan
    Moodie, Marj
    Watts, Jennifer J.
    Wang, Ling
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2023, 38 : 38 - 44
  • [43] Availability of data for cost-effectiveness comparison of child vision and hearing screening programmes
    Kik, Jan
    Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M.
    Mackey, Allison R.
    Carr, Gwen
    Horwood, Anna M.
    Fronius, Maria
    Carlton, Jill
    Griffiths, Helen J.
    Uhlen, Inger M.
    Simonsz, Huibert Jan
    Consortium, Country-Committees Joint-Partnership Of The Euscreen Study
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2023, 30 (02) : 62 - 68
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a systematic review of decision-analytical models
    Sanghera, Sabina
    Coast, Joanna
    Martin, Richard M.
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    Mohiuddin, Syed
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic kidney disease in the general adult population: a systematic review
    Yeo, See Cheng
    Wang, Hankun
    Ang, Yee Gary
    Lim, Chee Kong
    Ooi, Xi Yan
    CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a systematic review of decision-analytical models
    Sabina Sanghera
    Joanna Coast
    Richard M. Martin
    Jenny L. Donovan
    Syed Mohiuddin
    BMC Cancer, 18
  • [47] Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection using the BDProbeTec™ ET Chlamydia trachomatis amplified DNA assay on urine in a GUM clinic setting:: a simple, fast and cost-effective alternative
    Browning, MR
    Corden, S
    Mitchell, B
    Westmoreland, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2001, 12 (07) : 430 - 436
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening methods in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
    Mezei, Alex K.
    Armstrong, Heather L.
    Pedersen, Heather N.
    Campos, Nicole G.
    Mitchell, Sheona M.
    Sekikubo, Musa
    Byamugisha, Josaphat K.
    Kim, Jane J.
    Bryan, Stirling
    Ogilvie, Gina S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 141 (03) : 437 - 446
  • [49] Effect and cost-effectiveness of national gastric cancer screening in Japan: a microsimulation modeling study
    Huang, Hsi-Lan
    Leung, Chi Yan
    Saito, Eiko
    Katanoda, Kota
    Hur, Chin
    Kong, Chung Yin
    Nomura, Shuhei
    Shibuya, Kenji
    BMC MEDICINE, 2020, 18 (01) : 257
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness of an outreach program for HCC screening in patients with cirrhosis: a microsimulation modeling study
    Gurley, Tami
    Hernaez, Ruben
    Cerda, Vanessa
    Thomas, Tynaje
    Narasimman, Manasa
    Mittal, Sukul
    Al-Hasan, Mohammed
    Daher, Darine
    Singal, Amit G.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2025, 81