Leisure as a coping resource: A test of the job demand-control-support model

被引:43
|
作者
Joudrey, Allan D. [1 ]
Wallace, Jean E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
coping; depression; job stress; leisure; professionals; SOCIAL SUPPORT; FAMILY CONFLICT; WORK; STRESS; STRAIN; VACATION; DEPRESSION; GENDER; RECOVERY; NONWORK;
D O I
10.1177/0018726708100357
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This article explores whether leisure is an effective coping resource in response to the demands of one's job and in reducing depression. Karasek's job demand-control-support (JDCS) model of psychological strain serves as a framework for empirically examining the importance of leisure in reducing depression and buffering the detrimental effects of excessive job demands. This article relies on data from a sample of 887 law firm lawyers who are renowned for working in highly stressful work settings. We find that participating in active and social leisure activities or taking a vacation are important in reducing lawyers' depression, whereas participating in passive leisure is not. None of the leisure variables buffer the harmful effects of job demands on depression. We discuss the implications of these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 217
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Divergent effects of active coping on psychological distress in the context of the job demands-control-support model: the roles of job control and social support
    Akihito Shimazu
    Miyuki Shimazu
    Tsutomu Odara
    International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2005, 12 : 192 - 198
  • [42] Working on local time: Testing the job-demand-control-support model of stress with jail officers
    Ellison, Jared M.
    Caudill, Jonathan W.
    JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2020, 70
  • [43] Proactive Coping as a Personal Resource in the Expanded Job Demands-Resources Model
    Searle, Ben J.
    Lee, Leanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 22 (01) : 46 - 69
  • [44] Co-effect of Demand-control-support Model and Effort-reward Imbalance Model on Depression Risk Estimation in Humans: Findings from Henan Province of China
    Yu Shan Fa
    Nakata, Akinori
    Gu Gui Zhen
    Swanson, Naomi G.
    Zhou Wen Hui
    He Li Hua
    Wang Sheng
    BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2013, 26 (12) : 962 - 971
  • [45] Psychosocial job characteristics and smoking cessation: A prospective cohort study using the Demand-Control-Support and Effort-Reward Imbalance job stress models
    Ota, Atsuhiko
    Masue, Takeshi
    Yasuda, Nobufumi
    Tsutsumi, Akizumi
    Mino, Yoshio
    Ohara, Hiroshi
    Ono, Yuichiro
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (03) : 287 - 293
  • [46] THE JOB DEMANDS-CONTROL-SUPPORT MODEL AND PERCEIVED RISK OF ILLNESS OR ACCIDENT An application to Andalusia (Spain)
    Montero Simo, Maria Jose
    Rivera Torres, Pilar
    Araque Padilla, Rafael Angel
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE SOCIOLOGIA, 2013, 71 (03): : 643 - 668
  • [47] Associations between job demand-control-support and high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden: a cross-sectional study
    Christiansen, Filip
    Gynning, Britta Elsert
    Lashari, Abid
    Zuberbuhler, Josefina Pelaez
    Johansson, Gun
    Brulin, Emma
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND TOXICOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [48] Job Support, Coping, and Control: Assessment of Simultaneous Impacts Within the Occupational Stress Process
    Brough, Paula
    Drummond, Suzie
    Biggs, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 23 (02) : 188 - 197
  • [49] Job autonomy and workload as antecedents of workplace bullying: A two-wave test of Karasek's Job Demand Control Model for targets and perpetrators
    Baillien, Elfi
    De Cuyper, Nele
    De Witte, Hans
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 84 (01) : 191 - 208
  • [50] Can the job demand-control-(support) model predict disability support worker burnout and work engagement?
    Vassos, Maria
    Nankervis, Karen
    Skerry, Trevor
    Lante, Kerrie
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2019, 44 (02): : 139 - 149