AFLP analysis of somaclonal variation in Arabidopsis thaliana regenerated plants

被引:68
作者
Polanco, C [1 ]
Ruiz, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leon, Fac Biol, Area Genet, E-24071 Leon, Spain
关键词
Arabidopsis thaliana; AFLP; somaclonal variation; nucleotide diversity;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00029-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
AFLP analysis was performed in order to assess DNA variation among Arabidopsis thaliana plants regenerated by organogenesis from roots. Fifty-one regenerated plants were subjected to AFLP analysis using 12 primer combinations. The plants were obtained from root explants excised from five different seedlings. From the studied plants, 66.6% showed at least one variation when compared against the regenerated plants obtained from the same explant, and the number of mutations per plant ranged from one up to 18. However, the average proportion of shared AFLP fragments was higher than 99.4% among the regenerated plants as the variation found was due mainly to unique changes in single plants (singletons). The distribution of variation among the regenerated plants was uneven and only three regenerated plants accumulated 40% of the variations observed. Three AFLP markers out of the total 778 detected markers were polymorphic for several plants obtained from different calli. These markers may represent hypervariable regions of Arabidopsis genome. Values of nucleotide diversity estimated for each group of regenerated plants were from two to three orders of magnitude smaller than natural variation described for ecotypes of A. thaliana. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 824
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of somaclonal variation in transgenic and regenerated plants of Arabidopsis thaliana using methylation related metAFLP and TMD markers
    Coronel, Carlos J.
    Gonzalez, Ana I.
    Ruiz, Maria L.
    Polanco, Carlos
    PLANT CELL REPORTS, 2018, 37 (01) : 137 - 152
  • [2] Analysis of somaclonal variation in transgenic and regenerated plants of Arabidopsis thaliana using methylation related metAFLP and TMD markers
    Carlos J. Coronel
    Ana I. González
    María L. Ruiz
    Carlos Polanco
    Plant Cell Reports, 2018, 37 : 137 - 152
  • [3] Assessment of somaclonal variation for salinity tolerance in sweet potato regenerated plants
    Anwar, Nadia
    Kikuchi, Akira
    Watanabe, Kazuo N.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 9 (43): : 7256 - 7265
  • [4] Cytogenetic analysis of somaclonal variation in regenerated plants of Berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrium L.)
    Sheidai, Masoud
    Hamta, Ahmad
    CARYOLOGIA, 2008, 61 (04) : 392 - 396
  • [5] Somaclonal variation of regenerated plants in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)
    Md. Amzad Hossain
    Kunihiko Konisho
    Mineo Minami
    Kazuhiro Nemoto
    Euphytica, 2003, 130 (2) : 233 - 239
  • [6] Assessment of somaclonal variation in Dieffenbachia plants regenerated through indirect shoot organogenesis
    Shen, Xiuli
    Chen, Jianjun
    Kane, Michael E.
    Henny, Richard J.
    PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE, 2007, 91 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [7] Assessment of somaclonal variation in Dieffenbachia plants regenerated through indirect shoot organogenesis
    Xiuli Shen
    Jianjun Chen
    Michael E. Kane
    Richard J. Henny
    Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2007, 91 : 21 - 27
  • [8] Somaclonal variation of regenerated plants in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)
    Hossain, MA
    Konisho, K
    Minami, M
    Nemoto, K
    EUPHYTICA, 2003, 130 (02) : 233 - 239
  • [9] Somaclonal variation in morphological and biochemical traits in regenerated alfalfa (Medicago varia Mart.) plants
    Deineko, EV
    Tseveleva, ON
    Peltek, SE
    Babenko, VN
    Sidorchuk, YV
    Shumnyi, VK
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 44 (05) : 673 - 678
  • [10] Somaclonal variation in transgenic plants
    Sala, F
    Arencibia, A
    Castiglione, S
    Yifan, H
    Labra, M
    Savini, C
    Bracale, M
    Pelucchi, N
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON METHODS AND MARKERS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MICROPROPAGATION, 2000, (530): : 411 - 419