A Socio-cognitive Model of Sustainability Performance: Linking CEO Career Experience, Social Ties, and Attention Breadth

被引:22
作者
Ahn, Yoojung [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Business, Dept Management, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Corporate sustainability; Attention breadth; Career experience; External boards; Attention load; Attention capacity; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; COGNITIVE LOAD; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK; EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; MANAGERIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-020-04651-w
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Achieving sustainability as a firm outcome is increasingly a concern for CEOs. Attention breadth (executive attention where attention is focused on a variety of areas simultaneously) is an important capability for CEOs to have in order to achieve sustainability performance at the firm level, as sustainability requires attending to multiple areas simultaneously including environmental, social, and governance dimensions as well as financial performance. To further explicate the development of attention breadth, I explore the two socio-cognitive antecedents of attention breadth-career experience and social ties. Additionally, I examine the impact of CEO attention breadth on sustainability performance. A content analysis of letters to shareholders from a sample of Fortune 500 firms together with other archival data show an indirect influence of career experience and social ties on sustainability performance through the mediator of attention breadth. In particular, the number of social ties is shown to have more influence than career experience in determining the level of attention breadth, which I argue and show, ultimately leads to improved sustainability performance represented by a broader and more complex set of firm outcomes. The findings shed light on the antecedents of sustainability performance and expand the understanding of executive attention.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 321
页数:19
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Accenture, 2019, UN GLOB COMP ACC STA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Academy of Management Review, DOI [DOI 10.5465/AMR.1981.4288021, 10.2307/257144, DOI 10.2307/257144]
[3]   Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes [J].
Argote, L ;
McEvily, B ;
Reagans, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (04) :571-582
[4]  
AUPPERLE KE, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P446, DOI 10.5465/256210
[5]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[6]   The corporate challenges of sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2002, 16 (02) :122-131
[7]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736
[8]   Business sustainability: It is about time [J].
Bansal, Pratima ;
DesJardine, Mark .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2014, 12 (01) :70-78
[9]   How boards' internal and external social capital interact to affect firm performance [J].
Barroso-Castro, Carmen ;
del Mar Villegas-Perinan, Ma ;
Casillas-Bueno, Jose C. .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2016, 14 (01) :6-31
[10]   Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition [J].
Bogner, WC ;
Barr, PS .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (02) :212-226