What Do Primary Care Practitioners Want to Know? A Content Analysis of Questions Asked at the Point of Care

被引:15
作者
Bjerre, Lise M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Paterson, Nicholas R. [1 ]
McGowan, Jessie [1 ,3 ]
Hogg, William [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Campbell, Craig M. [5 ]
Viner, Gary [1 ]
Archibald, Douglas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Family Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Bruyere Res Inst, CT Lamont Primary Hlth Care Res Ctr, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Inst Populat Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[5] Royal Coll Phys & Surg, Off Profess Affairs, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
clinical questions; point-of-care learning; evidence-based medicine; family practice; education; medical; continuing; methods; continuing medical education; continuing professional development; self-assessment; performance improvement CE; CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION; GENERIC CLINICAL QUESTIONS; NEEDS-ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; TAXONOMY;
D O I
10.1002/chp.21191
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
IntroductionAssessing physician needs to develop continuing medical education (CME) activities is an integral part of CME curriculum development. The purpose of the present study was to demonstrate the feasibility of identifying areas of perceived greatest needs for continuing medical education (CME) by using questions collected electronically at the point of care. MethodsThis study is a secondary analysis of the Just-in-Time (JIT) information librarian consultation service database of questions using quantitative content analysis methods. The original JIT project demonstrated the feasibility of a real-time librarian service for answering questions asked by primary care clinicians at the point of care using a Web-based platform or handheld device. Data were collected from 88 primary care practitioners in Ontario, Canada, from October 2005 to April 2006. Questions were answered in less than 15 minutes, enabling clinicians to use the answer during patient encounters. ResultsDescription of type and frequency of questions asked, including the organ system on which the questions focused, was produced using 2 classification systems, the taxonomy of generic clinical questions (TGCQ), and the International Classification for Primary Care version 2 (ICPC-2). Of the original 1889 questions, 1871 (99.0%) were suitable for analysis. A total of 970 (52%) of questions related to therapy; of these, 671 (69.2%) addressed questions about drug therapy, representing 36% of all questions. Questions related to diagnosis (24.8%) and epidemiology (13.5%) were also common. Organ systems questions concerning musculoskeletal, endocrine, skin, cardiac, and digestive systems were asked more than other categories. DiscussionQuestions collected at the point of care provide a valuable and unique source of information on the true learning needs of practicing clinicians. The TGCQ classification allowed us to show that a majority of questions had to do with treatment, particularly drug treatment, whereas the use of the ICPC-2 classification illustrated the great variety of questions asked about the diverse conditions encountered in primary care. It is feasible to use electronically collected questions asked by primary care clinicians in clinical practice to categorize self-identified knowledge and practice needs. This could be used to inform the development of future learning activities.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 234
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Classifying Health Questions Asked by the Public Using the ICPC-2 Classification and a Taxonomy of Generic Clinical Questions: An Empirical Exploration of the Feasibility
    Boot, Cecile R. L.
    Meijman, Frans J.
    [J]. HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2010, 25 (02) : 175 - 181
  • [2] Sixteen years of ICPC use in Norwegian primary care: looking through the facts
    Botsis, Taxiarchis
    Bassoe, Carl-Fredrik
    Hartvigsen, Gunnar
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2010, 10
  • [3] A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES
    COHEN, J
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [4] Cooke G, 2013, AUST FAM PHYSICIAN, V42, P65
  • [5] Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence - A systematic review
    Davis, David A.
    Mazmanian, Paul E.
    Fordis, Michael
    Van Harrison, R.
    Thorpe, Kevin E.
    Perrier, Laure
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (09): : 1094 - 1102
  • [6] Questions Asked by Physicians as the Basis for Continuing Education Needs Assessment
    Ebell, Mark H.
    Cervero, Ronald
    Joaquin, Edward
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2011, 31 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [7] A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study
    Ely, JW
    Osheroff, JA
    Gorman, PN
    Ebell, MH
    Chambliss, ML
    Pifer, EA
    Stavri, PZ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7258) : 429 - 432
  • [8] GEBEL RS, 2000, ICPC 2 NL INT CLASS
  • [9] Hallgren Kevin A, 2012, Tutor Quant Methods Psychol, V8, P23
  • [10] Katerndabl DA, 2010, ANN FAM MED, V8, P341, DOI [10.1370/afm.1157, 10.1370/afm.1108]