High and low sensation seeking adolescents show distinct patterns of brain activity during reward processing

被引:55
作者
Cservenka, Anita [1 ]
Herting, Megan M. [1 ]
Seghete, Kristen L. Mackiewicz [1 ]
Hudson, Karen A. [2 ]
Nagel, Bonnie J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Behav Neurosci, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Psychiat, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
Adolescence; Sensation seeking; Reward; fMRI; RISK-TAKING; SUBSTANCE USE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ALCOHOL-USE; BEHAVIOR; FMRI; PERSONALITY; NEUROBIOLOGY; IMPULSIVITY; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.003
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous research has shown that personality characteristics, such as sensation seeking (SS), are strong predictors of risk-taking behavior during adolescence. However, the relationship between levels of SS and brain response has not been studied during this time period. Given the prevalence of risky behavior during adolescence, it is important to understand neurobiological differences in reward sensitivity between youth with high and low SS personalities. To this end, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine differences in brain activity in an adolescent sample that included 27 high (HSS) and 27 low sensation seekers (LSS), defined by the Impulsive Sensation Seeking scale of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (Zuckerman et al., 1993). In the scanner, participants played a modified Wheel of Fortune decision-making task (Cservenka and Nagel, 2012) that resulted in trials with monetary Wins or No Wins. We compared age- and sex-matched adolescent HSS and LSS (mean age = 13.94 +/- 1.05) on brain activity by contrasting Win vs. No Win trials. Our findings indicate that HSS show greater bilateral insular and prefrontal cortex (PFC) brain response on Win vs. No Win compared to LSS. Analysis of simple effects showed that while LSS showed comparable brain activity in these areas during Wins and No Wins, HSS showed significant differences in brain response to winning (activation) vs. not winning (deactivation), with between-group comparison suggesting significant differences in brain response, largely to reward absence. Group differences in insular activation between reward receipt and absence may suggest weak autonomic arousal to negative outcomes in HSS compared with LSS. Additionally, since the PFC is important for goal-directed behavior and attention, the current results may reflect that HSS allocate fewer attentional resources to negative outcomes than LSS. This insensitivity to reward absence in HSS may lead to a greater likelihood of maladaptive choices when negative consequences are not considered, and may be an early neural marker of decreased loss sensitivity that has been seen in addiction. This neurobiological information may ultimately be helpful in establishing prevention strategies aimed at reducing youth risk-taking and suggests value in further examination of neural associations with personality characteristics during adolescence. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 193
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Prediction error as a linear function of reward probability is coded in human nucleus accumbens
    Abler, Birgit
    Walter, Henrik
    Erk, Susanne
    Kammerer, Hannes
    Spitzer, Manfred
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 31 (02) : 790 - 795
  • [2] [Anonymous], 3 DIMENSIONAL COPLAN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1957, Two factor index of social position
  • [4] Diminished Frontostriatal Activity During Processing of Monetary Rewards and Losses in Pathological Gambling
    Balodis, Iris M.
    Kober, Hedy
    Worhunsky, Patrick D.
    Stevens, Michael C.
    Pearlson, Godfrey D.
    Potenza, Marc N.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 71 (08) : 749 - 757
  • [5] Novelty seeking modulates medial prefrontal activity during the anticipation of emotional stimuli
    Bermpohl, Felix
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Amedi, Amir
    Merabet, Lotfi B.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Wrase, Jana
    Schlagenhauf, Florian
    Bauer, Michael
    Heinz, Andreas
    Schlaug, Gottfried
    Northoff, Georg
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2008, 164 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [6] Adolescents, Adults and Rewards: Comparing Motivational Neurocircuitry Recruitment Using fMRI
    Bjork, James M.
    Smith, Ashley R.
    Chen, Gang
    Hommer, Daniel W.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (07):
  • [7] Incentive-elicited mesolimbic activation and externalizing symptomatology in adolescents
    Bjork, James M.
    Chen, Gang
    Smith, Ashley R.
    Hommer, Daniel W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 51 (07) : 827 - 837
  • [8] Incentive-elicited brain activation in adolescents: Similarities and differences from young adults
    Bjork, JM
    Knutson, B
    Fong, GW
    Caggiano, DM
    Bennett, SM
    Hommer, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (08) : 1793 - 1802
  • [9] Risk taking differences on a behavioral task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking
    Bornovalova, Marina A.
    Cashman-Rolls, Alex
    O'Donnell, Jennifer M.
    Ettinger, Kenneth
    Richards, Jerry B.
    deWit, H.
    Lejuez, C. W.
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2009, 93 (03) : 258 - 262
  • [10] Psychometric evaluation of the customary drinking and drug use record (CDDR): A measure of adolescent alcohol and drug involvement
    Brown, SA
    Myers, MG
    Lippke, L
    Tapert, SF
    Stewart, DG
    Vik, PW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1998, 59 (04): : 427 - 438