Optimal bidding strategy with the inclusion of wind power supplier in an emerging power market

被引:21
作者
Singh, Satyendra [1 ]
Fozdar, Manoj [1 ]
机构
[1] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol Jaipur, Dept Elect Engn, JLN Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
power generation economics; particle swarm optimisation; probability; Weibull distribution; wind power plants; pricing; search problems; power markets; optimisation; genetic algorithms; IEEE standards; optimal bidding strategy; wind power supplier; emerging power market; polistic electricity market structure; power producers; bidding process; wind power output uncertainty; inevitable uncertainty problem; wind power bidding; wind power scenarios; UNIT COMMITMENT PROBLEM; ELECTRICITY MARKETS; DISPATCH MODEL; GENERATION; OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCER;
D O I
10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0118
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In polistic electricity market structure, each power producers can maximise its profit through bidding strategy. Also, with the advent of renewable generation mostly wind has shaped a new prospect in the bidding process. Although, the wind power output uncertainty, wind power suppliers facing an inevitable uncertainty problem in an emerging power market. To alleviate the adverse impact of this uncertainty on wind power bidding, Weibull distribution is used to model wind power scenarios and the forward-reduction algorithm is utilised to reduce scenarios. Furthermore, an overestimation and underestimation cost function is modelled to measure the deviation of wind power output. The bidding strategy with the inclusion of wind power is proposed in this study to maximise profit. However, the uncertainty of rival's behaviour affects the bidding process, which minimised by utilising the normal probability distribution function. The proposed problem is tested on the IEEE standard 30-bus and 57-bus systems and solved by the gravitational search algorithm (GSA). The results are obtained without and with wind power and shows that the effects of wind power on market clearing price and bidding strategy. Moreover, GSA gives higher market clearing price and net profit as compared with particle swarm optimisation and genetic algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:1914 / 1922
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Real-time optimization of wind farms and fixed-head pumped-storage hydro-plants [J].
Bayon, L. ;
Grau, J. M. ;
Ruiz, M. M. ;
Suarez, P. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 2013, 90 (10) :2147-2160
[2]  
Bhattacharya K., 2012, Operation of Restructured Power Systems
[3]   Nonlinear system identification based on ANFIS-Hammerstein model using Gravitational search algorithm [J].
Cuevas, Erik ;
Diaz, Primitivo ;
Avalos, Omar ;
Zaldivar, Daniel ;
Perez-Cisneros, Marco .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 48 (01) :182-203
[4]   Optimal Bidding Strategy of a Strategic Wind Power Producer in the Short-Term Market [J].
Dai, Ting ;
Qiao, Wei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2015, 6 (03) :707-719
[5]   COMPETITIVE BIDDING IN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY [J].
DAVID, AK .
IEE PROCEEDINGS-C GENERATION TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, 1993, 140 (05) :421-426
[6]   Optimal power flow using gravitational search algorithm [J].
Duman, Serhat ;
Guvenc, Ugur ;
Sonmez, Yusuf ;
Yorukeren, Nuran .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 59 :86-95
[7]   Assessment of the cost associated with wind generation prediction errors in a liberalized electricity market [J].
Fabbri, A ;
Gómez, T ;
Román, S ;
Abbad, JR ;
Quezada, VHM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (03) :1440-1446
[8]  
Growe-Kuska N., 2003, POWER TECH C P 2003, V3, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1109/PTC.2003.1304379, 10.1109/PTC.2003.1304379]
[9]   An economic dispatch model incorporating wind power [J].
Hetzer, John ;
Yu, David C. ;
Bhattarai, Kalu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2008, 23 (02) :603-611
[10]   Integration of renewable energy sources in dynamic economic load dispatch problem using an improved fireworks algorithm [J].
Jadoun, Vinay Kumar ;
Pandey, Vipin Chandra ;
Gupta, Nikhil ;
Niazi, Khaleequr Rehman ;
Swarnkar, Anil .
IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2018, 12 (09) :1004-1011