Gender diversity in corporate boards and continuous disclosure: Evidence from Australia

被引:64
作者
Ahmed, Ammad [1 ]
Monem, Reza M. [2 ]
Delaney, Deborah [2 ]
Ng, Chew [2 ]
机构
[1] AUT Business Sch, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Griffith Univ, Griffith Business Sch, Nathan, Qld, Australia
关键词
Gender diversity; Women on corporate boards; Continuous disclosure; Corporate governance; Two-stage-least-squares method; Generalised methods of moments; Difference-in-differences; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE; AGENCY COSTS; WOMEN; GOVERNANCE; METAANALYSIS; FIRM; OVERCONFIDENCE; COMMUNICATION; INDEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcae.2017.05.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate whether gender-diverse boards contribute to capital market efficiency through their role in corporate disclosure. Using Australia's continuous disclosure regime, we provide evidence that female directors on the board improve the frequency and volume of all types of continuous disclosure. Further analyses show that the relationship between gender-diversity and continuous disclosure is non-linear. Moreover, it requires more than one female director to have any significant effect on continuous disclosure, which is consistent with the critical mass theory. The study uses lagged independent variables and the Two-Stage-Least Squares (2SLS) approach to minimise endogeneity concerns. The results are robust to alternative variable definitions. Moreover, the Generalised Methods of Moments (GMM) and difference-in-difference techniques are used. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 107
页数:19
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance [J].
Adams, Renee B. ;
Ferreira, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 94 (02) :291-309
[2]  
Ahmed A., 2015, CORP OWNSP CONTRL, V12, P261
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Handbook of labor economics, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03012-6, 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03012-6, DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463.(99)03012-6]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014 AC MAN C PHIL P
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, WORKING PAPER
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, DOI [10.1108/09513579610109987, DOI 10.1108/09513579610109987]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The Economist
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WORKING PAPER
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Content analysis
[10]   Board composition as the outcome of an internal bargaining process: empirical evidence [J].
Arthur, N .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2001, 7 (03) :307-340