Pre-exposure to Ambiguous Faces Modulates Top-Down Control of Attentional Orienting to Counterpredictive Gaze Cues

被引:12
作者
Abubshait, Abdulaziz [1 ]
Momen, Ali [2 ]
Wiese, Eva [2 ]
机构
[1] Italian Inst Technol, Robot Domain, Genoa, Italy
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept Psychol, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
human-robot interaction; social-cognition; gaze-cueing; cognitive conflict; categorical boundary; mind perception; SOCIAL ATTENTION; UNCANNY VALLEY; VISUAL-ATTENTION; JOINT ATTENTION; HUMAN REALISM; EYE GAZE; PERCEPTION; MIND; DIRECTION; COGNITION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02234
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Understanding and reacting to others' nonverbal social signals, such as changes in gaze direction (i.e., gaze cue), are essential for social interactions, as it is important for processes such as joint attention and mentalizing. Although attentional orienting in response to gaze cues has a strong reflexive component, accumulating evidence shows that it can be top-down controlled by context information regarding the signals' social relevance. For example, when a gazer is believed to be an entity "with a mind" (i.e., mind perception), people exert more top-down control on attention orienting. Although increasing an agent's physical human-likeness can enhance mind perception, it could have negative consequences on top-down control of social attention when a gazer's physical appearance is categorically ambiguous (i.e., difficult to categorize as human or nonhuman), as resolving this ambiguity would require using cognitive resources that otherwise could be used to top-down control attention orienting. To examine this question, we used mouse-tracking to explore if categorically ambiguous agents are associated with increased processing costs (Experiment 1), whether categorically ambiguous stimuli negatively impact top-down control of social attention (Experiment 2), and if resolving the conflict related to the agent's categorical ambiguity (using exposure) would restore top-down control to orient attention (Experiment 3). The findings suggest that categorically ambiguous stimuli are associated with cognitive conflict, which negatively impact the ability to exert top-down control on attentional orienting in a counterpredicitive gaze-cueing paradigm; this negative impact, however, is attenuated when being pre-exposed to the stimuli prior to the gaze-cueing task. Taken together, these findings suggest that manipulating physical human-likeness is a powerful way to affect mind perception in human-robot interaction (HRI) but has a diminishing returns effect on social attention when it is categorically ambiguous due to drainage of cognitive resources and impairment of top-down control.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 106 条
[21]   Face age modulates gaze following in young adults [J].
Ciardo, Francesca ;
Marino, Barbara F. M. ;
Actis-Grosso, Rossana ;
Rossetti, Angela ;
Ricciardelli, Paola .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
[22]  
DALMASO M, 2020, PSYCHON B REV 0406
[23]   Re-Encountering Individuals Who Previously Engaged in Joint Gaze Modulates Subsequent Gaze Cueing [J].
Dalmaso, Mario ;
Edwards, S. Gareth ;
Bayliss, Andrew P. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 (02) :271-284
[24]   The Impact of Same- and Other-Race Gaze Distractors on the Control of Saccadic Eye Movements [J].
Dalmaso, Mario ;
Galfano, Giovanni ;
Castelli, Luigi .
PERCEPTION, 2015, 44 (8-9) :1020-1028
[25]   Temporal Dynamics Underlying the Modulation of Social Status on Social Attention [J].
Dalmaso, Mario ;
Galfano, Giovanni ;
Coricelli, Carol ;
Castelli, Luigi .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03)
[26]   Social status gates social attention in humans [J].
Dalmaso, Mario ;
Pavan, Giulia ;
Castelli, Luigi ;
Galfano, Giovanni .
BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 8 (03) :450-452
[27]   Familiarity accentuates gaze cuing in women but not men [J].
Deaner, Robert O. ;
Shepherd, Stephen V. ;
Platt, Michael L. .
BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 3 (01) :64-67
[28]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72
[29]   Advancing Our Understanding of the Interface Between Perception and Intergroup Relations [J].
Deska, Jason C. ;
Lloyd, E. Paige ;
Hugenberg, Kurt .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2016, 27 (04) :286-289
[30]   The Politics of Attention: Differences in Visual Cognition Between Liberals and Conservatives [J].
Dodd, Michael D. ;
Hibbing, John R. ;
Smith, Kevin B. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, VOL 65, 2016, 65 :277-309