Development and testing of Australian prehospital care quality indicators: study protocol

被引:4
作者
Pap, Robin [1 ,2 ]
Lockwood, Craig [1 ]
Stephenson, Matthew [1 ]
Simpson, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, JBI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
accident & emergency medicine; quality in health care; health services administration & management; CLINICAL INDICATORS; HEALTH-CARE; EVIDENCE SUMMARIES; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; RESPONSE-TIME; ASSOCIATION; CONSENSUS; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038310
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Historically, ambulance services were established to provide rapid transport of patients to hospital. Contemporary prehospital care involves provision of sophisticated 'mobile healthcare' to patients across the lifespan presenting with a range of injuries or illnesses of varying acuity. Because of its young age, the paramedicine profession has until recently experienced a lack of research capacity which has led to paucity of a discipline-specific, scientific evidence-base. Therefore, the performance and quality of ambulance services has traditionally been measured using simple, evidence-poor indicators forming a deficient reflection of the true quality of care and providing little direction for quality improvement efforts. This paper reports the study protocol for the development and testing of quality indicators (QIs) for the Australian prehospital care setting. Methods and analysis This project has three phases. In the first phase, preliminary work in the form of a scoping review was conducted which provided an initial list of QIs. In the subsequent phase, these QIs will be developed by aggregating them and by performing related rapid reviews. The summarised evidence will be used to support an expert consensus process aimed at optimising the clarity and evaluating the validity of proposed QIs. Finally, in the third phase those QIs deemed valid will be tested for acceptability, feasibility and reliability using mixed research methods. Evidence-based indicators can facilitate meaningful measurement of the quality of care provided. This forms the first step to identify unwarranted variation and direction for improvement work. This project will develop and test quality indicators for the Australian prehospital care setting. Ethics and dissemination This project has been approved by the University of Adelaide Human Research Ethics Committee. Findings will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at appropriate scientific conferences, as well as posts on social media and on the project's website.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association, 2014, STAND ED PSYCH TEST, P230
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SAGE HDB MIXED METHO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SAGE HDB MIXED METHO
[4]  
Aromataris E., 2020, JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis
[5]  
Australian Government Productivity Commission-Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision, 2020, REP GOV SERV AMB SER
[6]  
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, 2019, ANN REP 2018 19 OUR
[7]  
Barrett S.C.H., 2014, The Princeton guide to evolution, P356
[8]   EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES RESPONSE TIME AND MORTALITY IN AN URBAN SETTING [J].
Blanchard, Ian E. ;
Doig, Christopher J. ;
Hagel, Brent E. ;
Anton, Andrew R. ;
Zygun, David A. ;
Kortbeek, John B. ;
Powell, D. Gregory ;
Williamson, Tyler S. ;
Fick, Gordon H. ;
Innes, Grant D. .
PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2012, 16 (01) :142-151
[9]   Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry [J].
Borah, Rohit ;
Brown, Andrew W. ;
Capers, Patrice L. ;
Kaiser, Kathryn A. .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (02)
[10]  
Bowles Kathy H, 2003, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, P106