ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF PRIMARY DROPLET CHARACTERISTICS IN THE NEAR FIELD OF A PREFILMING AIRBLAST ATOMIZER

被引:0
|
作者
Gepperth, S. [1 ]
Koch, R. [1 ]
Bauer, H-J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, ITS, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2013, VOL 1A | 2013年
关键词
TWIN-FLUID ATOMIZATION; PRESSURE CONDITIONS; SPRAYS; SIZE; AIR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
As the dominating parameters influencing the Sauter mean diameter of the spray produced by a prefilming airblast atomizer, the air velocity, liquid surface tension and atomizing edge thickness could be identified. Correlations for the prediction of the droplet sizes produced by prefilming airblast atomizers are compared to droplet sizes measured close to the atomizing edge. The measurements were performed using three geometrical variants of a planar atomizer over a wide range of operating conditions. The diagnostics are based on a particle and ligament tracking technique, that enables simultaneous measurement of the liquid blobs and ligaments formed at the atomizing edge and the droplets in the primary breakup region of the atomizer The comparison between measured and calculated droplet diameter indicates, that most of the correlations are capable of reproducing the correct tendency. However, since the measurement data of most correlations were collected in a region where secondary atomization effects can obscure the initial droplet sizes in the primary breakup region, the droplet sizes are generally predicted too small.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Close Nozzle Spray Characteristics of a Prefilming Airblast Atomizer
    Holz, Simon
    Braun, Samuel
    Chaussonnet, Geoffroy
    Koch, Rainer
    Bauer, Hans-Joerg
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (14):
  • [2] The Effect of Film Development on Primary Breakup in a Prefilming Airblast Atomizer
    Wetherell, Jack R. J.
    Garmory, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2024, 146 (09):
  • [3] Numerical analysis of the primary breakup applying the embedded DNS approach to a generic prefilming airblast atomizer
    Sauer, Benjamin
    Sadiki, Amsini
    Janicka, Johannes
    Sauer, Benjamin, 1600, Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd, United States (06): : 179 - 192
  • [4] Two-phase computational fluid dynamics analysis applied to prefilming pure-airblast atomizer
    Buelow, PEO
    Mao, CP
    Smith, S
    Bretz, D
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2003, 19 (02) : 235 - 241
  • [5] Analysis of energy efficiency of air in atomizing pseudoplastic liquid using a specially designed prefilming airblast atomizer
    He, WZ
    Jiang, ZH
    Suo, QL
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2003, 42 (13) : 3144 - 3149
  • [6] GEOMETRIC PRIMARY ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS IN AN AIRBLAST ATOMIZER, HIGH PRESSURE CONDITIONS
    Fernandez, V. G.
    Lavergne, G.
    Berthoumieu, P.
    ATOMIZATION AND SPRAYS, 2011, 21 (01) : 17 - 29
  • [7] DYNAMIC PRIMARY ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS IN AN AIRBLAST ATOMIZER, HIGH PRESSURE CONDITIONS
    Fernandez, V. G.
    Lavergne, G.
    Berthoumieu, P.
    ATOMIZATION AND SPRAYS, 2011, 21 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [8] NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY BREAKUP UNDER HIGH-ALTITUDE RELIGHT CONDITIONS APPLYING THE EMBEDDED DNS APPROACH TO A GENERIC PREFILMING AIRBLAST ATOMIZER
    Sauer, Benjamin
    Spyrou, Nikolaos
    Sadiki, Amsini
    Janicka, Johannes
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2013, VOL 1A, 2013,
  • [9] NEAR-FIELD OBSERVATIONS OF A COAXIAL AIRBLAST ATOMIZER UNDER ELEVATED AMBIENT PRESSURE
    Burtnett, Thomas J.
    Morgan, Timothy B.
    Dahlstrom, Timothy C.
    Heindel, Theodore J.
    ATOMIZATION AND SPRAYS, 2022, 32 (09) : 39 - 55
  • [10] Influence of steady and oscillating swirl on the near-field spray characteristics in a two-fluid coaxial atomizer
    Machicoane, Nathanael
    Ricard, Guillaume
    Osuna-Orozco, Rodrigo
    Huck, Peter Dearborn
    Aliseda, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2020, 129 (129)