Adaptations to COVID-19 in Community Corrections Agencies across the United States

被引:34
作者
Viglione, Jill [1 ]
Alward, Lucas M. [1 ]
Lockwood, Ashley [1 ]
Bryson, Sara [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Criminal Justice, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Dept Criminal Justice, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
community corrections; COVID-19; parole; probation; pandemic; alternatives to incarceration; early release mechanisms; prison reform; LOW-RISK OFFENDERS; SUPERVISION; PROBATION; SANCTIONS; PAROLEES;
D O I
10.1080/15564886.2020.1818153
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Currently, there are more than 4.5 million Americans under some form of community supervision. Much of the experience of traditional community supervision relies on face-to-face interactions. Individuals on supervision often require treatment or services typically delivered in face-to-face settings. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has forced community corrections' agencies to quickly rethink how they do business, with limited existing research on how to adapt supervision protocols in the midst of a global pandemic. Using surveys of directors of community corrections' agencies across the United States, the goal of the current study was to examine how community corrections' agencies have adapted traditional supervision processes to address disease prevention and containment in addition to supporting client needs and community safety as a result of COVID-19. Changes implemented during the pandemic may have implications for the future landscape of community supervision. Understanding how and what agencies prioritize in a time of global crisis can provide a foundation for identifying sustainable changes as well as understanding future impacts on system and client-level outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1297
页数:21
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Ahlin E. M., 2013, FEDERAL PROBATION, V77, P32
[2]   Why inequality could spread COVID-19 [J].
Ahmed, Faheem ;
Ahmed, Na'eem ;
Pissarides, Christopher ;
Stiglitz, Joseph .
LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 5 (05) :E240-E240
[3]   REHABILITATING CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY AND PRACTICE [J].
Andrews, D. A. ;
Bonta, James .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2010, 16 (01) :39-55
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, QUALTRICS SURVEY SOF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CORRECTIONAL POPULAT
[6]   The effects of low-intensity supervision for lower-risk probationers: updated results from a randomized controlled trial [J].
Barnes, Geoffrey ;
Hyatt, Jordan ;
Ahlman, Lindsay ;
Kent, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF CRIME & JUSTICE, 2012, 35 (02) :200-220
[7]   Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: a randomized, controlled trial [J].
Barnes, Geoffrey C. ;
Ahlman, Lindsay ;
Gill, Charlotte ;
Sherman, Lawrence W. ;
Kurtz, Ellen ;
Malvestuto, Robert .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2010, 6 (02) :159-189
[8]   Telepsychological Services With Criminal Justice and Substance Abuse Clients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Batastini, Ashley B. ;
King, Christopher M. ;
Morgan, Robert D. ;
McDaniel, Brieann .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2016, 13 (01) :20-30
[9]  
Belshaw S. H., 2011, INT J PUNISHMENT SEN, V7, P98
[10]  
Boman JH, 2019, CRIM JUSTICE STUD, V32, P356, DOI [10.1080/1478601X.2019.1664506, 10.1080/1478601x.2019.1664506]