Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage

被引:54
作者
Aslan, Belma I. [1 ]
Kucukkaraca, Ebru [1 ]
Turkoz, Cagri [1 ]
Dincer, Mufide [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Forsus; Mini-screw; Fixed functional appliance; Class II correction; JASPER JUMPER APPLIANCE; CLASS-II MALOCCLUSION; SKELETAL;
D O I
10.2319/032613-240.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the dentofacial effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FRD) used with miniscrew anchorage (FRDMS) and compare them with those of conventional FRD and an untreated Class II control group. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 48 Class II subjects. Sixteen patients (13.68 +/- 1.09 years of age) were treated with FRDMS, whereas 17 subjects (14.64 +/- 1.56 years of age) were treated with only FRD. Also, a control sample of 15 untreated Class II subjects (14.13 +/- 1.50 years of age) was constructed. Angular and linear measurements were made on 96 lateral cephalograms. Paired t, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Class I molar relationship and overjet correction were achieved in an average period of 6.5 +/- 1.97 and 5.5 +/- 1.80 months in the FRDMS and FRD groups, respectively. No skeletal effect was determined in both treatment groups. Greater overbite correction was found in the FRD group. Retrusion and extrusion of maxillary incisors, distalization of maxillary molars, and extrusion of mandibular molars were significant in both treatment groups. Labial tipping of mandibular incisors was significantly greater in the FRD group than in the FRDMS group. Conclusion: Overjet and molar correction was totally dentoalveolar. Unfavorable labial tipping of mandibular incisors was effectively minimized with the usage of miniscrews.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 87
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: A cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study [J].
Aras, Aynur ;
Ada, Emel ;
Saracoglu, Hatice ;
Gezer, Naciye S. ;
Aras, Isil .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 140 (05) :616-625
[2]   Patient experiences with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device [J].
Bowman, Amy C. ;
Saltaji, Humam ;
Flores-Mir, Carlos ;
Preston, Brian ;
Tabbaa, Sawsan .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (03) :437-446
[3]  
COPE JB, 1994, ANGLE ORTHOD, V64, P113
[4]  
Covell DA, 1999, ANGLE ORTHOD, V69, P311
[5]  
El-Sheikh Moaaz Mohamed, 2007, World J Orthod, V8, P30
[6]   Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in Class II patients [J].
Franchi, Lorenzo ;
Alvetro, Lisa ;
Giuntini, Veronica ;
Masucci, Caterina ;
Defraia, Efisio ;
Baccetti, Tiziano .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (04) :678-683
[7]  
Gunay Esen Ali, 2011, Eur J Dent, V5, P423
[8]   Clinical Application and Effects of the Forsus™ Spring: A Study of a New Herbst Hybrid [Klinische Anwendung und Effekte der Forsus™-Feder: Eine Studie über ein neues Herbst-Hybrid] [J].
Heinig N. ;
Göz G. .
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2001, 62 (6) :436-450
[9]  
Janssen KI, 2008, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V23, P75
[10]   Class II non-extraction patients treated with the forsus fatigue resistant device versus intermaxillary elastics [J].
Jones, Graham ;
Buschang, Peter H. ;
Kim, Ki Beom ;
Oliver, Donald R. .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2008, 78 (02) :332-338