Dynamic stakeholder interaction analysis: Innovative smart living design cases

被引:15
作者
Solaimani, Sam [1 ]
Guldemond, Nick [2 ]
Bouwman, Harry [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Elect Engn Math & Comp Sci, Dept Interact Intelligence, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands
[3] Abo Akad Univ, IAMSR, Turku, Finland
关键词
Stakeholder analysis; Business models; Networked business; Inter-organizational systems smart living; IDENTIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-013-0143-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In order to become more innovative, companies that operate in the Smart Living domain increasingly initiate and participate in networked business environments that transcend industry boundaries. Inter-organizational collaboration is often characterized by conflicting strategic interests and incoherent operational business processes and procedures. Although many scholars and practitioners use stakeholder analysis to gain insight into the actors' relationships and interactions, existing literature on stakeholder analysis focuses mainly on high-level strategic analysis, often limited to a conceptual and static understanding of stakeholder interests. In this paper, it is argued that a 'true' understanding of stakeholders can be achieved by looking at their interactions and interdependencies at a more detailed level. This study uses a conceptual framework from the service innovation and business model domain, the VIP framework, to extend stakeholder analysis by including an analysis of their dynamic interactions and processes. The qualitative evaluation of the framework's application in illustrative design cases shows that this extension provides additional insights into stakeholders, and their potential operational conflicts and critical dependencies. By making these conflicts and interdependencies explicit, products and services are potentially easier to implement and commercialize.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 328
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 1 25 YEARS BLED C
[2]   Boundary objects in design: An ecological view of design artifacts [J].
Bergman, Mark ;
Lyytinen, Kalle ;
Mark, Gloria .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 8 (11) :546-568
[3]  
Bourne Lynda., 2005, Management Decision, V43, P649, DOI DOI 10.1108/00251740510597680
[4]  
Bouwman H., 2013, INT J INNOV IN PRESS, V10
[5]  
Bouwman H., 2008, Mobile Service Innovation and Business Models
[6]  
Bunn MD, 2002, J BUS IND MARK, V17, P181, DOI 10.1108/08858620210419808
[7]  
Chung L, 1999, INT FED INFO PROC, V12, P545
[8]   A STAKEHOLDER FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING AND EVALUATING CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE [J].
CLARKSON, MBE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (01) :92-117
[9]   Futures dilemmas for marketers: can stakeholder analysis add value? [J].
Clulow, Val .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 39 (9-10) :978-997
[10]  
Crosby B, 1992, Stakeholder analysis: a vital tool for strategic managers