Threatened Species and the Potential Loss of Phylogenetic Diversity: Conservation Scenarios Based on Estimated Extinction Probabilities and Phylogenetic Risk Analysis

被引:129
作者
Faith, Daniel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
EDGE of Existence; expected diversity; phylogenetic diversity; probability of extinction; risk analysis; red list; threatened species;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01068.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
New species conservation strategies, including the EDGE of Existence (EDGE) program, have expanded threatened species assessments by integrating information about species' phylogenetic distinctiveness. Distinctiveness has been measured through simple scores that assign shared credit among species for evolutionary heritage represented by the deeper phylogenetic branches. A species with a high score combined with a high extinction probability receives high priority for conservation efforts. Simple hypothetical scenarios for phylogenetic trees and extinction probabilities demonstrate how such scoring approaches can provide inefficient priorities for conservation. An existing probabilistic framework derived from the phylogenetic diversity measure (PD) properly captures the idea of shared responsibility for the persistence of evolutionary history. It avoids static scores, takes into account the status of close relatives through their extinction probabilities, and allows for the necessary updating of priorities in light of changes in species threat status. A hypothetical phylogenetic tree illustrates how changes in extinction probabilities of one or more species translate into changes in expected PD. The probabilistic PD framework provided a range of strategies that moved beyond expected PD to better consider worst-case PD losses. In another example, risk aversion gave higher priority to a conservation program that provided a smaller, but less risky, gain in expected PD. The EDGE program could continue to promote a list of top species conservation priorities through application of probabilistic PD and simple estimates of current extinction probability. The list might be a dynamic one, with all the priority scores updated as extinction probabilities change. Results of recent studies suggest that estimation of extinction probabilities derived from the red list criteria linked to changes in species range sizes may provide estimated probabilities for many different species. Probabilistic PD provides a framework for single-species assessment that is well-integrated with a broader measurement of impacts on PD owing to climate change and other factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1470
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Use and misuse of the IUCN Red List Criteria in projecting climate change impacts on biodiversity [J].
Akcakaya, H. . Resit ;
Butchart, Stuart H. M. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Stuart, Simon N. ;
Hilton-Taylor, Craig .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2006, 12 (11) :2037-2043
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[3]  
Barker GM, 2002, BIOL J LINN SOC, V76, P165, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb02081.x
[4]   Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond [J].
Butchart, SHM ;
Stattersfield, AJ ;
Baillie, J ;
Bennun, LA ;
Stuart, SN ;
Akçakaya, HR ;
Hilton-Taylor, C ;
Mace, GM .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 360 (1454) :255-268
[5]  
*EDGE, 2007, TOP CALC EDG SCOR
[6]  
Faith D.P., 2007, SYST BIOL, V56, P690
[7]   Quantifying biodiversity: a phylogenetic perspective [J].
Faith, DP .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (01) :248-252
[8]   Integrating phylogenetic diversity, complementarity, and endemism for conservation assessment [J].
Faith, DP ;
Reid, CAM ;
Hunter, J .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) :255-261
[9]   Complementarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algorithms for conservation [J].
Faith, DP ;
Carter, G ;
Cassis, G ;
Ferrier, S ;
Wilkie, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2003, 6 (03) :311-328
[10]   CONSERVATION EVALUATION AND PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY [J].
FAITH, DP .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1992, 61 (01) :1-10