Analysis of Oral Mucosa of Users of Crack through Micronucleus Technique

被引:13
作者
Almeida, Tais C. [1 ]
Stefanon, Eliza B. C. [2 ]
Rech, Virginia C. [2 ]
Sagrillo, Michele R. [2 ]
Bohrer, Paula L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Ctr Ciencias Saude, Dept Anal Clin & Toxicol, Programa Posgrad Ciencias Farmaceut, BR-97105900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ Franciscano, Curso Farm, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
关键词
Crack; micronuclei; carcinogens; oral mucosa; Feulgen technique; COCAINE; CELLS; FREQUENCY; MARIJUANA; WORKERS;
D O I
10.7754/Clin.Lab.2012.120113
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The high consumption of crack has become a serious public health problem. The properties of this drug as well as the effects caused in the body have been approached in different research studies. However, there is no knowledge about the carcinogen level this substance can cause to the user. The presence of micronuclei as biomarkers of genotoxic action reflects the degree of cellular exposure to carcinogens. Considering this fact, the following research aimed to assess the frequency of micronuclei in the oral mucosa of those chemically dependent on crack. Methods: The sample consisted of buccal mucosa cells from 10 controls, non-smokers, and non-users of drugs and 10 individuals chemically dependent on crack admitted to a hospital For cell staining, Feulgen technique was applied. Results: Of the 1000 cells analyzed for each sample, the exposed group had an average of 4.3 micronuclei, presenting significant difference (p < 0.01) when compared with the control group, which averaged 0.1 micronuclei. Regarding pictotic cells, the exposed group is also significantly different from the control group (p < 0.01). The karyorrhexis is the nuclear change with the greatest difference between the two groups. It has an average of 347.9 cells undergoing apoptosis for the exposed group, while the control group presented 34.4 cells, obtaining a significant difference, p < 0.001. Conclusions: The results assessed by micronucleus technique suggested that crack together with other factors associated with the drug might be linked to an increased incidence of micronuclei. (Clin. Lab. 2012;58:1269-1275. DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2012.120113)
引用
收藏
页码:1269 / 1275
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Crack lung and heart presenting after chemotherapy in a 65-year-old man with non-Hodgkin lymphoma [J].
Alvarez, G. G. ;
van der Jagt, R. H. C. .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (01) :63-65
[2]  
[Anonymous], J PNEUMOL
[3]   Assessment of micronucleus frequency in normal oral mucosa of patients exposed to carcinogens [J].
Bohrer, PL ;
Sant'Ana, M ;
Paiva, RL ;
da Silva, IL ;
Rados, PV .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2005, 49 (03) :265-272
[4]   Effect of smoking habit on the frequency of micronuclei in human lymphocytes: results from the Human MicroNucleus project [J].
Bonassi, S ;
Neri, M ;
Lando, C ;
Ceppi, M ;
Lin, YP ;
Chang, WSP ;
Holland, N ;
Kirsch-Volders, M ;
Zeiger, E ;
Fenech, M .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2003, 543 (02) :155-166
[5]   Women's health and use of crack cocaine in context: Structural and 'everyday' violence [J].
Bungay, Vicky ;
Johnson, Joy L. ;
Varcoe, Colleen ;
Boyd, Susan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2010, 21 (04) :321-329
[6]  
Carrard V.C., 2007, Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia de Porto Alegre, V48, P77
[7]  
Chang WC, 2005, INJURY EXTRA, V36, P324
[8]   A focus on cocaine and crack addiction [J].
Charles-Nicolas, A. ;
Lacoste, J. ;
Ballon, N. .
ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2009, 167 (07) :504-507
[9]   Stimulant Abuse: Pharmacology, Cocaine, Methamphetamine, Treatment, Attempts at Pharmacotherapy [J].
Ciccarone, Daniel .
PRIMARY CARE, 2011, 38 (01) :41-+
[10]   Cytomorphometric analysis of crack cocaine effects on the oral mucosa [J].
Cogo Woyceichoski, Iverson Ernani ;
de Arruda, Elcy Pinto ;
Resende, Luciane Grochocki ;
Naval Machado, Maria Angela ;
Trindade Gregio, Ana Maria ;
Azevedo, Luciana Reis ;
Soares de Lima, Antonio Adilson .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2008, 105 (06) :745-749