In Support of a Simple Urethrocutaneous Fistula Closure Technique Following Hypospadias Repair

被引:6
作者
Dekalo, Snir [1 ,2 ]
Ben-David, Reuben [1 ,2 ]
Bar-Yaakov, Noam [1 ,2 ]
Dubi-Sobol, Adit [1 ,2 ]
Ekstein, Margaret [1 ,2 ]
Ben-Chaim, Jacob [1 ,2 ]
Bar-Yosef, Yuval [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Med Ctr & Sch Med, Dept Pediat Urol, Dana Dwek Childrens Hosp, 6 Weizman St, IL-6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
FLAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the success rates of a simple posthypospadias urethrocutaneous fistula repair. STUDY DESIGN We evaluated children who underwent urethrocutaneous fistula closure by means of a simple standard technique in which the fistula tract was dissected to its base and resected and the urethral defect closed with a single layer of continuous sutures and covered with local subcutaneous tissue. No urethral stents or catheters were used, and the patients were discharged on the same day. Excluded were children who underwent fistula repair by a different technique, revision hypospadias repair for fistula, or concomitant meatoplasty for meatal stenosis. Study endpoints were fistula recurrence and the need for further penile surgery other than fistula repair. RESULTS Seventy-two children underwent 81 repairs. The mean follow-up was 7.9 years. Recurrence occurred in 17 cases (21%). Seven children (9%) underwent penile surgery other than fistula repair, including meatoplasty (n = 5) and re-do hypospadias repair for a diagnosis other than fistula recurrence (n = 2). There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between large and small fistulas, coronal or more proximal fistulas, or children w/wo prior fistula repairs. CONCLUSION Standard fistula closure solely by adjacent tissues yielded success rates of 79% after long-term follow-up. This repair can be safely offered with the expectation of similar results for a variety of urethrocutaneous fistulas in children. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 215
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Salvage Mathieu urethroplasty: Reuse of local tissue in failed hypospadias repair
    Bar-Yosef, Y
    Binyamini, J
    Matzkin, H
    Ben-Chaim, J
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (06) : 1212 - 1215
  • [2] Fistula after single-stage primary hypospadias repair - A systematic review of the literature
    Hardwicke, J. T.
    Bechar, J. A.
    Hodson, J.
    Osmani, O.
    Park, A. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (12) : 1647 - 1655
  • [3] A simple technique for small-diameter urethrocutaneous fistula repair: Ligation
    Karakus, S. C.
    User, I. R.
    Akcaer, V.
    Ozokutan, B. H.
    Ceylan, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2017, 13 (01) : 88 - 90
  • [4] Outcome analysis of tunica vaginalis flap for the correction of recurrent urethrocutaneous fistula in children
    Landau, EH
    Gofrit, ON
    Meretyk, S
    Katz, G
    Golijanin, D
    Shenfeld, OZ
    Pode, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (04) : 1596 - 1599
  • [5] Urethrocutaneous fistulae after hypospadias repair: When do they occur?
    Liao, Adelene Y.
    Smith, Grahame H. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2016, 52 (05) : 556 - 560
  • [6] Urethrocutaneous fistula: preserve the tract and turn it inside out: the PATIO repair
    Malone, Peter R.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (04) : 550 - 554
  • [7] Does Circumcision Increase Meatal Stenosis Risk?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Morris, Brian J.
    Krieger, John N.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2017, 110 : 16 - 26
  • [8] Repair of hypospadias fistula using a penile skin advancement flap with penile dartos interposition
    Neilson, A. G.
    Nicholls, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2013, 9 (06) : 890 - 894
  • [9] Two-stage hypospadias repair with a free graft for severe primary and revision hypospadias: A single surgeon's experience with long-term follow-up
    Pfistermueller, K. L. M.
    Manoharan, S.
    Desai, D.
    Cuckow, P. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2017, 13 (01) : 35.e1 - 35.e7
  • [10] Shankar KR, 2002, BJU INT, V89, P103, DOI 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02551.x