Towards a better understanding of quality concepts and issues in higher education

被引:0
作者
Susniene, D. [1 ]
Zostautiene, D. [1 ]
Sargunas, G. [2 ]
Juzeniene, E. [2 ]
Atay, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kaunas Univ Technol, Nemuno Str 33, LT-37164 Panevezys, Lithuania
[2] Panevezys Coll, Laisves A 23, LT-35200 Panevezys, Lithuania
[3] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, TR-17100 Canakkale, Turkey
来源
6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHANGES IN SOCIAL AND BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT (CISABE'2016) | 2016年
关键词
quality; higher education; stakeholder expectations; quality assurance; benchmarking; ASSURANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In order to ensure effectiveness and efficiency of higher education for improving the performance and quality of individuals, organizations and societies, the quality topic should be approached seriously and professionally. Quality in higher education is a complex subject, with many ways of interpreting quality, and many theories, models and performance indicators used to try to quantify and evaluate the quality. One way of looking at the question of quality, especially of public institutions, is to ask whether they are 'fit for purpose'. That, however, simply moves the question somewhere else, rather than answering it. Does a large organization like a university have a single purpose? Is the purpose of a university constant over time? And whose purpose is important in assessing quality? The answers to all of these questions are contested, and it is possible, though probably fruitless, to spend a great deal of time defining the purpose of the higher education institutions and their quality. Therefore, the goal of the article is to show a theoretical approach regarding how quality can differently be treated and achieved in higher education institutions. (C) 2016 D. Susniene, D. Zostautiene, G. Sargunas, E. Juzeniene. Peer-review under responsibility of the Kaunas University of Technology, Panevezys Faculty of Technologies and Business
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 64
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]  
Mora J.-G., 2009, ENTREPRENEURIALISM U, P74
[22]  
Morley L., 2003, QUALITY POWER HIGHER
[23]  
Office of Government Commerce, 2008, BENCHMARKING
[24]  
Power M., 2000, International Journal of Auditing, V4, P111, DOI DOI 10.1111/1099-1123.00306
[25]   Quality Management in Higher Education: Towards a Better Understanding of an Emerging Field [J].
Pratasavitskaya, Halina ;
Stensaker, Bjorn .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 16 (01) :37-50
[26]  
Rizvi F., 2010, GLOBALIZING ED POLIC
[27]  
Sachs J., 1994, Australian Universities Review, V37, P22
[28]  
Shore C., 2000, Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy, P57, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203449721
[29]   Beyond the multiversity: neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university [J].
Shore, Cris .
SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2010, 18 (01) :15-29
[30]   Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Which Pasts to Build on, What Futures to Contemplate? [J].
Singh, Mala .
QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 16 (02) :189-194