Development and acceptability testing of decision trees for self-management of prosthetic socket fit in adults with lower limb amputation

被引:8
作者
Lee, Daniel Joseph [1 ]
Veneri, Diana A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hartford, Dept Rehabil Sci, 200 Bloomfield Ave,Dana Hall 312A, Hartford, CT 06117 USA
[2] Sacred Heart Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Fairfield, CT USA
关键词
Amputee; education; prosthesis; decision tree; self-management; SUSPENSION SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2017.1286694
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: The most common complaint lower limb prosthesis users report is inadequacy of a proper socket fit. Adjustments to the residual limb-socket interface can be made by the prosthesis user without consultation of a clinician in many scenarios through skilled self-management. Decision trees guide prosthesis wearers through the self-management process, empowering them to rectify fit issues, or referring them to a clinician when necessary. This study examines the development and acceptability testing of patient-centered decision trees for lower limb prosthesis users. Methods: Decision trees underwent a four-stage process: literature review and expert consultation, designing, two-rounds of expert panel review and revisions, and target audience testing. Results: Fifteen lower limb prosthesis users (average age 61 years) reviewed the decision trees and completed an acceptability questionnaire. Participants reported agreement of 80% or above in five of the eight questions related to acceptability of the decision trees. Disagreement was related to the level of experience of the respondent. Conclusions: Decision trees were found to be easy to use, illustrate correct solutions to common issues, and have terminology consistent with that of a new prosthesis user. Some users with greater than 1.5 years of experience would not use the decision trees based on their own self-management skills.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1071
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Bloomquist T, 2001, AANA J, V69, P211
[2]  
Carroll K., 2006, Prosthetics and patient management: a comprehensive clinical approach, V1st
[3]  
Cumming J, 2015, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V1
[4]   Reamputation, mortality, and health care costs among persons with dysvascular lower-limb amputations [J].
Dillingham, TR ;
Pezzin, LE ;
Shore, AD .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (03) :480-486
[5]  
Freed SS, 2004, J Prosthet Orthot, V16, P18
[6]   Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use [J].
Gailey, Robert ;
Allen, Kerry ;
Castles, Julie ;
Kucharik, Jennifer ;
Roeder, Mariah .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 45 (01) :15-29
[7]   Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: Systematic review of literature [J].
Gholizadeh, H. ;
Abu Osman, N. A. ;
Eshraghi, A. ;
Ali, S. ;
Razak, N. A. .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2014, 29 (01) :87-97
[8]   Transfemoral Prosthesis Suspension Systems A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Gholizadeh, Hossein ;
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan ;
Eshraghi, Arezoo ;
Ali, Sadeeq .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2014, 93 (09) :809-823
[9]   Prosthetic socket fit comfort score [J].
Hanspal, RS ;
Fisher, K ;
Nieveen, R .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 25 (22) :1278-1280
[10]   Vacuum-Assisted Socket Suspension Compared With Pin Suspension for Lower Extremity Amputees: Effect on Fit, Activity, and Limb Volume [J].
Klute, Glenn K. ;
Berge, Jocelyn S. ;
Biggs, Wayne ;
Pongnumkul, Suporn ;
Popovic, Zoran ;
Curless, Brian .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (10) :1570-1575