Implant decontamination with 2% chlorhexidine during surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

被引:59
作者
de Waal, Y. C. M. [1 ]
Raghoebar, G. M. [2 ]
Meijer, H. J. A. [1 ,2 ]
Winkel, E. G. [1 ]
van Winkelhoff, A. J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Dent & Oral Hyg, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Med & Oral Microbiol, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
chlorhexidine; decontamination; dental implants; microbiology; peri-implantitis; resective surgery; ALVEOLAR OSTEITIS; OPTIMAL DOSAGE; DIGLUCONATE; PLAQUE; SURVIVAL; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12419
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe objective of this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and microbiological effects of implant surface decontamination with a 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) solution in comparison with a 0.12% chlorhexidine+0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) solution during resective surgical peri-implantitis treatment. Material and methodsForty-four patients (108 implants) with peri-implantitis were treated with resective surgical treatment consisting of bone re-contouring, surface debridement and chemical decontamination, and apically repositioned flap. Patients were randomly allocated to decontamination with a 2% CHX solution (test group) or 0.12% CHX+0.05% CPC (control group). Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded before treatment (baseline), and at 3, 6, and 12months after treatment. Microbiological parameters were recorded during surgery. ResultsMultilevel analysis showed no significant differences in bleeding, suppuration, probing pocket depth, and radiographic bone loss between control and test group over three follow-up measurements (3, 6, and 12months) from baseline. Both decontamination procedures resulted in significant reductions in anaerobic bacterial counts on the implant surface, but no significant difference was noted between control and test group (mean log 3.372.34 vs. 3.65 +/- 2.87, P=0.99). ConclusionsThe use of a 2% CHX solution for implant surface decontamination during resective peri-implantitis therapy does not lead to improved clinical, radiographic, or microbiological results compared with a 0.12% CHX+0.05% CPC solution. Overall, the additional use of CHX reduces anaerobic bacterial load on the implant surface better than mechanical debridement alone, but does not seem to enhance clinical treatment outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01852253).
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1023
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in implant dentistry. A systematic review on critical aspects in design, outcome assessment and clinical relevance
    Cairo, Francesco
    Sanz, Ignacio
    Matesanz, Paula
    Nieri, Michele
    Pagliaro, Umberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 39 : 81 - 107
  • [2] Biofilm formation on surface characterized micro-implants for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics
    Chin, Mervyn Y. H.
    Sandham, Andrew
    de Vries, Joop
    van der Mei, Henny C.
    Busscher, Henk J.
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 2007, 28 (11) : 2032 - 2040
  • [3] THE EFFECTS OF CHLORHEXIDINE ON THE ATTACHMENT AND GROWTH OF CULTURED HUMAN PERIODONTAL CELLS
    CLINE, NV
    LAYMAN, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1992, 63 (07) : 598 - 602
  • [4] OPTIMAL DOSAGE AND METHOD OF DELIVERING CHLORHEXIDINE SOLUTIONS FOR INHIBITION OF DENTAL PLAQUE
    CUMMING, BR
    LOE, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 1973, 8 (02) : 57 - 62
  • [5] Implant decontamination during surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    de Waal, Yvonne C. M.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Slater, James J. R. Huddleston
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Winkel, Edwin G.
    van Winkelhoff, Arie Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 40 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [6] Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of periimplantitis
    Esposito, Marco
    Grusovin, Maria Gabriella
    Worthington, Helen V.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (01):
  • [7] FLOTRA L, 1971, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, V79, P119
  • [8] Effect of chlorhexidine digluconate on different cell types: A molecular and ultrastructural investigation
    Giannelli, M.
    Chellini, F.
    Margheri, M.
    Tonelli, P.
    Tani, A.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2008, 22 (02) : 308 - 317
  • [9] Effect of six different peri-implantitis disinfection methods on in vivo human oral biofilm
    Gosau, Martin
    Hahnel, Sebastian
    Schwarz, Frank
    Gerlach, Till
    Reichert, Torsten E.
    Buergers, Ralf
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (08) : 866 - 872
  • [10] DOSE-RESPONSE OF CHLORHEXIDINE AGAINST PLAQUE AND COMPARISON WITH TRICLOSAN
    JENKINS, S
    ADDY, M
    NEWCOMBE, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1994, 21 (04) : 250 - 255