On the feasibility of a consumer-based allocation method in national GHG inventories

被引:37
作者
Caro, Dario [1 ]
Bastianoni, Simone [1 ]
Borghesi, Simone [2 ]
Pulselli, Federico Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Ecodynam Grp, Dept Earth Environm & Phys Sci, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Siena, Dept Polit & Int Sci, I-53100 Siena, Italy
关键词
Consumer-based perspective; Carbon intensity; GHG emissions accounting; International trade; CARBON; TRADE; EMISSIONS; KYOTO;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.021
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has defined a comprehensive method for taking into account greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions released from different countries. The geographical or producer-based perspective currently used in the IPCC framework does not consider (and may therefore encourage) delocalization of production from industrialized to other countries, thus allocating responsibility for emissions associated with goods and services, consumed in one country but produced elsewhere, exclusively to the producer. The Environmentally Extended Input-Output (EE10) analysis has long been recognized as a useful tool for attributing GHG emissions or resource use to final consumers in a consistent accounting framework. While it is clear that there are several advantages to using a consumer-based perspective with the EEIO analysis, questions regarding the implementation of this methodology have arisen, and its adoption in dealing with GHGs inventory has so far been limited. Here, we propose a formalization, in order to evaluate GHG emissions associated with goods and services that are traded internationally, based on a systemic approach that places the responsibility on consumer countries, and weighs imported and exported goods by applying national carbon intensity factors. The use of these aggregate indicators is appropriate to have a reference point for a worldwide application of this tool in order to implement policies for GHG emission reduction. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 643
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FEEM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, UN COMM TRAD STAT DA
[3]  
[Anonymous], EUR MAN SUPPL US INP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GOOD PRACTICE GUIDAN
[5]   The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions [J].
Bastianoni, S ;
Pulselli, FM ;
Tiezzi, E .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 49 (03) :253-257
[6]   Kyoto: doing our best is no longer enough [J].
Brook, Barry W. ;
Rowley, Nick ;
Flannery, Tim F. .
NATURE, 2007, 450 (7169) :478-478
[7]   The supply chain of CO2 emissions [J].
Davis, Steven J. ;
Peters, Glen P. ;
Caldeira, Ken .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (45) :18554-18559
[8]   Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions [J].
Davis, Steven J. ;
Caldeira, Ken .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (12) :5687-5692
[9]   Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets [J].
den Elzen, Michel ;
Hohne, Niklas .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2008, 91 (3-4) :249-274
[10]   Trading away damage: Quantifying environmental leakage through consumption-based, life-cycle analysis [J].
Ghertner, D. Asher ;
Fripp, Matthias .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) :563-577