Sentence processing in the visual and auditory modality: Do comma and prosodic break have parallel functions?

被引:24
作者
Kerkhofs, Roel [1 ]
Vonk, Wietske [1 ,2 ]
Schriefers, Herbert [3 ]
Chwilla, Dorothee J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Language Studies, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Inst Cognit & Informat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, FC Donders Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
language processing; prosodic break; ERP; N400; LAN; CPS; P600;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.034
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Two Event-Related Potential (ERP) studies contrast the processing of locally ambiguous sentences in the visual and the auditory modality. These sentences are disambiguated by a lexical element. Before this element appears in a sentence, the sentence can also be disambiguated by a boundary marker: a comma in the visual modality, or a prosodic break in the auditory modality. Previous studies have shown that a specific ERP component, the Closure Positive Shift (CPS), can be elicited by these markers. The results of the present studies show that both the comma and the prosodic break disambiguate the ambiguous sentences before the critical lexical element, despite the fact that a clear CPS is only found in the auditory modality. Comma and prosodic break thus have parallel functions irrespective of whether they do or do not elicit a CPS. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 118
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Baayen R., 1993, CELEX LEXICAL DATA B
[2]   Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian. N400 and P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli [J].
Balconi, C ;
Pozzoli, U .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2005, 34 (01) :71-98
[3]  
BOGELS S, INTERPLAY PROS UNPUB
[4]   Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies [J].
Cabeza, R ;
Nyberg, L .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (01) :1-47
[5]   The mechanism underlying backward priming in a lexical decision task: Spreading activation versus semantic matching [J].
Chwilla, DJ ;
Hagoort, P ;
Brown, CM .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) :531-560
[6]   ERPs and domain specificity: Beating a straw horse [J].
Coulson, S ;
King, JW ;
Kutas, M .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1998, 13 (06) :653-672
[7]  
Fodor J.D., 2002, P NELS, V32
[8]   SYNTACTIC PROCESSING - EVIDENCE FROM DUTCH [J].
FRAZIER, L .
NATURAL LANGUAGE & LINGUISTIC THEORY, 1987, 5 (04) :519-559
[9]   Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Hahne, A ;
Saddy, D .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2002, 31 (01) :45-63
[10]   Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Hahne, A ;
Mecklinger, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (05) :1219-1248