Straw utilization for biofuel production: A consequential assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from bioethanol and biomethane provision with a focus on the time dependency of emissions

被引:20
作者
Buchspies, Benedikt [1 ,2 ]
Kaltschmitt, Martin [1 ]
Junginger, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Tech Univ, Inst Environm Technol & Energy Econ, Eissendorfer Str 40, D-20173 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2020年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
2G biofuels; advanced biofuels; bioethanol; biomethane; consequential LCA; GHG emissions; lignocellulosic biofuels; second-generation biofuels; time dependency of emissions; wheat straw; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; WHEAT-STRAW; SOIL CARBON; NITROGEN TURNOVER; RESIDUES; ETHANOL; MITIGATION; INHIBITORS;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12734
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The shift from straw incorporation to biofuel production entails emissions from production, changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) and through the provision of (co-)products and entailed displacement effects. This paper analyses changes in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions arising from the shift from straw incorporation to biomethane and bioethanol production. The biomethane concept comprises comminution, anaerobic digestion and amine washing. It additionally provides an organic fertilizer. Bioethanol production comprises energetic use of lignin, steam explosion, enzymatic hydrolysis and co-fermentation. Additionally, feed is provided. A detailed consequential GHG balance with in-depth focus on the time dependency of emissions is conducted: (a) the change in the atmospheric load of emissions arising from the change in the temporal occurrence of emissions comparing two steady states (before the shift and once a new steady state has established); and (b) the annual change in overall emissions over time starting from the shift are assessed. The shift from straw incorporation to biomethane production results in net changes in GHG emissions of (a) -979 (-436 to -1,654) and (b) -955 (-220 to -1,623) kg CO2-eq. per t(dry matter)straw converted to biomethane (minimum and maximum). The shift to bioethanol production results in net changes of (a) -409 (-107 to -610) and (b) -361 (57 to -603) kg CO2-eq. per t(dry matter)straw converted to bioethanol. If the atmospheric load of emissions arising from different timing of emissions is neglected in case (a), the change in GHG emissions differs by up to 54%. Case (b) reveals carbon payback times of 0 (0-49) and 19 (1-100) years in case of biomethane and bioethanol production, respectively. These results demonstrate that the detailed inclusion of temporal aspects into GHG balances is required to get a comprehensive understanding of changes in GHG emissions induced by the introduction of advanced biofuels from agricultural residues.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 805
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alexander LV, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P3
[2]   Greenhouse gas emission timing in life cycle assessment and the global warming potential of perennial energy crops [J].
Almeida, Joana ;
Degerickx, Jeroen ;
Achten, Wouter M. J. ;
Muys, Bart .
CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2015, 6 (5-6) :185-195
[3]   Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J].
Almeida, Jodo R. M. ;
Modig, Tobias ;
Petersson, Anneli ;
Hahn-Hagerdal, Barbel ;
Liden, Gunnar ;
Gorwa-Grauslund, Marie F. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 82 (04) :340-349
[4]  
Alvira P., 2016, Bioethanol, V2, P66
[5]   Biogas production from straw-the challenge feedstock pretreatment [J].
Andersen, Lennart Folke ;
Parsin, Stanislav ;
Luedtke, Oliver ;
Kaltschmitt, Martin .
BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2022, 12 (02) :379-402
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, V82, P82
[7]   Carbon debt and payback time - Lost in the forest? [J].
Bentsen, Niclas Scott .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 73 :1211-1217
[8]   Quantifying the climate change effects of bioenergy systems: Comparison of 15 impact assessment methods [J].
Brandao, Miguel ;
Kirschbaum, Miko U. F. ;
Cowie, Annette L. ;
Hjuler, Susanne Vedel .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2019, 11 (05) :727-743
[9]   Comparative analysis of attributional corporate greenhouse gas accounting, consequential life cycle assessment, and project/policy level accounting: A bioenergy case study [J].
Brander, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 167 :1401-1414
[10]   Role of Digestate and Biochar in Carbon-Negative Bioenergy [J].
Breunig, Hanna M. ;
Amirebrahimi, Jahon ;
Smith, Sarah ;
Scown, Corinne D. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (22) :12989-12998